New comment by Duncaen on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/30946#issuecomment-842285671

Comment:
Not sure if there is any value in renaming the file in upstream rules, they are most likely also either hard code the specific path in the profile or allow patterns.
Would also break existing `/etc/apparmor.d/local` configuration.

I'm not sure yet if I prefer a package with our profiles or just shipping the profiles we wrote with the package they are for.
If we plan to ship one big package then I think it would be better to create a new separate repository instead of maintaining then inside of void-packages.