New comment by FollieHiyuki on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/31076#issuecomment-847140379

Comment:
@kawaiiamber what I meant was to use `yarn` instead of `npm`.

Packaging the MIT code is a bad idea. It will have no security fixes, etc. It is just the 1.5 years behind snapshot of the main code base with the license changed. So ... the licensing model is worse then Vscode :(

> Since onivim2 doesn't allow distribution, does this mean the AUR is in license violation as it pulls from the current repo, not the mit one? https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=onivim2

The AUR and our `restricted` packages doesn't provide binaries or the source code. They only have the build instructions, and the users are the ones pulling the source themselves. So it is not a violation.