[PR PATCH] zoom: update to 5.7.28991.0726_1

[PR PATCH] zoom: update to 5.7.28991.0726_1

[vcyzteen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 791 bytes --]

There is a new pull request by vcyzteen against master on the void-packages repository

https://github.com/vcyzteen/void-packages Test
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/32343

zoom: update to 5.7.28991.0726_1
<!-- Mark items with [x] where applicable -->

#### General
- [ ] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements)

#### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
- [ ] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
- [x] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR

A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/32343.patch is attached

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-Test-32343.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 999 bytes --]

From ebda0c0cc7d7d7f4a4f40daa333b9e57164e354e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=C2=A9TwT?= <vcyzscape@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 00:55:17 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] zoom: update to 5.7.28991.0726_1

---
 srcpkgs/zoom/template | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/srcpkgs/zoom/template b/srcpkgs/zoom/template
index ef5b208e2db3..71628a6c079a 100644
--- a/srcpkgs/zoom/template
+++ b/srcpkgs/zoom/template
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Template file for 'zoom'
 pkgname=zoom
-version=5.7.26030.0627
+version=5.7.28991.0726
 revision=1
 archs="x86_64"
 wrksrc=zoom
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ maintainer="Daniel Santana <daniel@santana.tech>"
 license="custom:Proprietary"
 homepage="https://zoom.us/"
 distfiles="https://cdn.zoom.us/prod/${version}/zoom_x86_64.rpm"
-checksum=75b87639bebf3eaeb2de4c1ea3f47a9b76f6bcad1312a842dd4e9d40071024fa
+checksum=003c35abc2dea55d3f27c28dca627ddfff69cdc2fe03dcaf1dda021770cc6cd9
 repository=nonfree
 noshlibprovides=yes
 noverifyrdeps=yes

Re: zoom: update to 5.7.28991.0726_1

[vcyzteen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 168 bytes --]

New comment by vcyzteen on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/32343#issuecomment-893667421

Comment:
@paper42 now its fine sir?

Re: zoom: update to 5.7.28991.0726_1

[paper42]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 150 bytes --]

New comment by paper42 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/32343#issuecomment-893685920

Comment:
lgtm :+1:

Re: [PR PATCH] [Merged]: zoom: update to 5.7.28991.0726_1

[paper42]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 641 bytes --]

There's a merged pull request on the void-packages repository

zoom: update to 5.7.28991.0726_1
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/32343

Description:
<!-- Mark items with [x] where applicable -->

#### General
- [ ] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements)

#### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
- [ ] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
- [x] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR

Re: [PR PATCH] [Merged]: zoom: update to 5.7.28991.0726_1

[paper42]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 641 bytes --]

There's a merged pull request on the void-packages repository

zoom: update to 5.7.28991.0726_1
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/32331

Description:
<!-- Mark items with [x] where applicable -->

#### General
- [ ] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements)

#### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
- [ ] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
- [x] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR