New comment by cinerea0 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33318#issuecomment-943989565

Comment:
@ericonr 
> Hm, any reason it can't be the same package?

According to earlier discussions (that I think took place on IRC) the consensus was that it would be best to install pre-built firmware binaries instead of building them manually. As such, if we're building the tools from source, the firmware would come from the `sof-bin` repo and the tools would come from the `sof` repo. Unless you're suggesting using two distfiles in one package?

Also, regarding that musl error, that parsing step is performed by a tool from `alsa-utils`. Unless we have examples of that working correctly on musl in other circumstances, it is equally likely to be the fault of their topologies as it is that tool.