* Re: [PR PATCH] [Updated] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
2021-11-06 13:25 [PR PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2 st3r4g
@ 2021-11-06 13:31 ` st3r4g
2021-11-06 13:58 ` st3r4g
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: st3r4g @ 2021-11-06 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1593 bytes --]
There is an updated pull request by st3r4g against master on the void-packages repository
https://github.com/st3r4g/void-packages qpwgraph
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926
New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
<!-- Mark items with [x] where applicable -->
#### General
- [x] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements)
#### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
- [x] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
- [ ] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR
<!--
If GitHub CI cannot be used to validate the build result (for example, if the
build is likely to take several hours), make sure to
[skip CI](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration).
When skipping CI, uncomment and fill out the following section.
Note: for builds that are likely to complete in less than 2 hours, it is not
acceptable to skip CI.
-->
<!--
#### Does it build and run successfully?
(Please choose at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build. More are better.)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
- [ ] aarch64-musl
- [ ] armv7l
- [ ] armv6l-musl
-->
A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926.patch is attached
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-qpwgraph-33926.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1089 bytes --]
From b6c7fc1f663c630c0b2adb1f36d82e779d5336fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Ragni <stefano.ragni@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 14:20:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
---
srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template
diff --git a/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template b/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..286d51db2a6a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Template file for 'qpwgraph'
+pkgname=qpwgraph
+version=0.0.2
+revision=1
+wrksrc="${pkgname}-v${version}"
+build_style=cmake
+hostmakedepends="pkg-config"
+makedepends="qt6-base-devel pipewire-devel"
+short_desc="Graph manager for PipeWire"
+maintainer="Stefano Ragni <stefano.ragni@outlook.com>"
+license="GPL-2.0-or-later"
+homepage="https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/rncbc/qpwgraph"
+distfiles="https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/rncbc/qpwgraph/-/archive/v${version}/qpwgraph-v${version}.tar.gz"
+checksum=30465f601ecf09c1a7075dc1c93cabb88b4ca81744b4def2165f5c1a6dc2cf86
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PR PATCH] [Updated] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
2021-11-06 13:25 [PR PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2 st3r4g
2021-11-06 13:31 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " st3r4g
@ 2021-11-06 13:58 ` st3r4g
2021-11-06 16:20 ` st3r4g
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: st3r4g @ 2021-11-06 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1593 bytes --]
There is an updated pull request by st3r4g against master on the void-packages repository
https://github.com/st3r4g/void-packages qpwgraph
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926
New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
<!-- Mark items with [x] where applicable -->
#### General
- [x] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements)
#### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
- [x] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
- [ ] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR
<!--
If GitHub CI cannot be used to validate the build result (for example, if the
build is likely to take several hours), make sure to
[skip CI](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration).
When skipping CI, uncomment and fill out the following section.
Note: for builds that are likely to complete in less than 2 hours, it is not
acceptable to skip CI.
-->
<!--
#### Does it build and run successfully?
(Please choose at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build. More are better.)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
- [ ] aarch64-musl
- [ ] armv7l
- [ ] armv6l-musl
-->
A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926.patch is attached
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-qpwgraph-33926.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1098 bytes --]
From 3194320fc99661a93727ddacc26210ef6f9a38d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Ragni <stefano.ragni@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 14:20:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
---
srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template
diff --git a/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template b/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b242f379d109
--- /dev/null
+++ b/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Template file for 'qpwgraph'
+pkgname=qpwgraph
+version=0.0.2
+revision=1
+wrksrc="${pkgname}-v${version}"
+build_style=cmake
+hostmakedepends="pkg-config qt6-base"
+makedepends="qt6-base-devel pipewire-devel"
+short_desc="Graph manager for PipeWire"
+maintainer="Stefano Ragni <stefano.ragni@outlook.com>"
+license="GPL-2.0-or-later"
+homepage="https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/rncbc/qpwgraph"
+distfiles="https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/rncbc/qpwgraph/-/archive/v${version}/qpwgraph-v${version}.tar.gz"
+checksum=30465f601ecf09c1a7075dc1c93cabb88b4ca81744b4def2165f5c1a6dc2cf86
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
2021-11-06 13:25 [PR PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2 st3r4g
2021-11-06 13:31 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " st3r4g
2021-11-06 13:58 ` st3r4g
@ 2021-11-06 16:20 ` st3r4g
2021-11-08 13:45 ` [PR REVIEW] " ericonr
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: st3r4g @ 2021-11-06 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]
New comment by st3r4g on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926#issuecomment-962474680
Comment:
it's still trying to run the target's `moc`...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PR REVIEW] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
2021-11-06 13:25 [PR PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2 st3r4g
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-06 16:20 ` st3r4g
@ 2021-11-08 13:45 ` ericonr
2021-11-08 13:45 ` ericonr
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2021-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 181 bytes --]
New review comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926#discussion_r744736539
Comment:
Any reason to prefer qt6 over qt5?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PR REVIEW] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
2021-11-06 13:25 [PR PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2 st3r4g
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-08 13:45 ` [PR REVIEW] " ericonr
@ 2021-11-08 13:45 ` ericonr
2021-11-08 17:32 ` st3r4g
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2021-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
New review comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926#discussion_r744736811
Comment:
0.0.3 is out
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PR REVIEW] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
2021-11-06 13:25 [PR PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2 st3r4g
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-08 13:45 ` ericonr
@ 2021-11-08 17:32 ` st3r4g
2021-11-08 17:44 ` st3r4g
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: st3r4g @ 2021-11-08 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 286 bytes --]
New review comment by st3r4g on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926#discussion_r744946659
Comment:
not really, I would just stick to what the developer uses more often, which I think is qt6. But if there are reasons to prefer qt5, it's ok.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
2021-11-06 13:25 [PR PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2 st3r4g
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-08 17:32 ` st3r4g
@ 2021-11-08 17:44 ` st3r4g
2021-11-08 17:45 ` [PR REVIEW] " st3r4g
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: st3r4g @ 2021-11-08 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 341 bytes --]
New comment by st3r4g on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926#issuecomment-963405336
Comment:
> Does this bring clear improvements over qjackctl already?
Mainly the ability to work also for video, also quicker to use (one less click then qjackctl, to open the graph from the floating window).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PR REVIEW] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
2021-11-06 13:25 [PR PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2 st3r4g
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-08 17:44 ` st3r4g
@ 2021-11-08 17:45 ` st3r4g
2021-11-24 14:37 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " st3r4g
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: st3r4g @ 2021-11-08 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 285 bytes --]
New review comment by st3r4g on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926#discussion_r744946659
Comment:
not really, I would just stick to what the developer uses regularly, which I think is qt6. But if there are reasons to prefer qt5, it's ok.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PR PATCH] [Updated] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
2021-11-06 13:25 [PR PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2 st3r4g
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-08 17:45 ` [PR REVIEW] " st3r4g
@ 2021-11-24 14:37 ` st3r4g
2022-01-28 7:43 ` [PR PATCH] [Closed]: " ericonr
2022-01-28 7:43 ` ericonr
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: st3r4g @ 2021-11-24 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1736 bytes --]
There is an updated pull request by st3r4g against master on the void-packages repository
https://github.com/st3r4g/void-packages qpwgraph
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926
New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
<!-- Mark items with [x] where applicable -->
#### General
- [x] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements)
#### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
- [x] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
- [ ] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR
<!--
If GitHub CI cannot be used to validate the build result (for example, if the
build is likely to take several hours), make sure to
[skip CI](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration).
When skipping CI, uncomment and fill out the following section.
Note: for builds that are likely to complete in less than 2 hours, it is not
acceptable to skip CI.
-->
<!--
#### Does it build and run successfully?
(Please choose at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build. More are better.)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
- [ ] aarch64-musl
- [ ] armv7l
- [ ] armv6l-musl
-->
![Screenshot from 2021-11-06 17-24-31](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23401174/140616697-f01434ae-b07f-46c3-937b-edd89fdfce20.png)
A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926.patch is attached
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-qpwgraph-33926.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2115 bytes --]
From 0a32111f262c1cc090609e23c5040375a375f52c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Ragni <stefano.ragni@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 14:20:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.5
---
srcpkgs/qpwgraph/patches/moc.patch | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 srcpkgs/qpwgraph/patches/moc.patch
create mode 100644 srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template
diff --git a/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/patches/moc.patch b/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/patches/moc.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5e9f0968e3f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/patches/moc.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+--- a/CMakeLists.txt.orig 2021-11-24 15:27:42.891757768 +0100
++++ b/CMakeLists.txt 2021-11-24 15:28:58.797756873 +0100
+@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@
+
+ include (GNUInstallDirs)
+
++set (CMAKE_AUTOUIC ON)
++set (CMAKE_AUTOMOC ON)
++set (CMAKE_AUTORCC ON)
+
+ # Check for Qt...
+ if (CONFIG_QT6)
+--- a/src/CMakeLists.txt.orig 2021-11-24 15:27:59.704757570 +0100
++++ b/src/CMakeLists.txt 2021-11-24 15:28:14.245757398 +0100
+@@ -2,10 +2,6 @@
+
+ set (CMAKE_INCLUDE_CURRENT_DIR ON)
+
+-set (CMAKE_AUTOUIC ON)
+-set (CMAKE_AUTOMOC ON)
+-set (CMAKE_AUTORCC ON)
+-
+ if (EXISTS ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/config.h)
+ file (REMOVE ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/config.h)
+ endif ()
diff --git a/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template b/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..75db8c5ef6e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/srcpkgs/qpwgraph/template
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Template file for 'qpwgraph'
+pkgname=qpwgraph
+version=0.0.5
+revision=1
+wrksrc="${pkgname}-v${version}"
+build_style=cmake
+hostmakedepends="pkg-config qt6-base"
+makedepends="qt6-base-devel pipewire-devel"
+short_desc="Graph manager for PipeWire"
+maintainer="Stefano Ragni <stefano.ragni@outlook.com>"
+license="GPL-2.0-or-later"
+homepage="https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/rncbc/qpwgraph"
+distfiles="https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/rncbc/qpwgraph/-/archive/v${version}/qpwgraph-v${version}.tar.gz"
+checksum=b51c5cd3e5318bd11ec032c33f9f0bc1f9f131958549eff91fa2f038f5af5988
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PR PATCH] [Closed]: New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
2021-11-06 13:25 [PR PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2 st3r4g
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-24 14:37 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " st3r4g
@ 2022-01-28 7:43 ` ericonr
2022-01-28 7:43 ` ericonr
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2022-01-28 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1581 bytes --]
There's a closed pull request on the void-packages repository
New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926
Description:
<!-- Mark items with [x] where applicable -->
#### General
- [x] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements)
#### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested?
- [x] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me
- [ ] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR
<!--
If GitHub CI cannot be used to validate the build result (for example, if the
build is likely to take several hours), make sure to
[skip CI](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration).
When skipping CI, uncomment and fill out the following section.
Note: for builds that are likely to complete in less than 2 hours, it is not
acceptable to skip CI.
-->
<!--
#### Does it build and run successfully?
(Please choose at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build. More are better.)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- [ ] I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
- [ ] aarch64-musl
- [ ] armv7l
- [ ] armv6l-musl
-->
![Screenshot from 2021-11-06 17-24-31](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23401174/140616697-f01434ae-b07f-46c3-937b-edd89fdfce20.png)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2
2021-11-06 13:25 [PR PATCH] New package: qpwgraph-0.0.2 st3r4g
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-28 7:43 ` [PR PATCH] [Closed]: " ericonr
@ 2022-01-28 7:43 ` ericonr
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2022-01-28 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/33926#issuecomment-1023963514
Comment:
Merged in #35076, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread