New comment by ahesford on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/34226#issuecomment-982789591

Comment:
This is a senseless *non sequitur* and there is no hypocrisy. We provide different browsers and their engines because people have individual preferences. Hating both Firefox and Chromium, I rely on `qt5-webengine` at the heart of `qutebrowser`. The benefit, obviously, is user choice. The drawbacks are maintenance burden and resource demands. The team has picked a point that seems like a reasonable tradeoff.

The question raised here is what benefit you provide by changing the configuration to enable LTO at the expense of build time and memory consumption.

When arguing with team members about concerns raised by your changes or the standards we apply to review, you would do well to remember that Void members are the arbiters, and your burden is not to show us the error of our ways, but of the enlightenment in yours.