New comment by atweiden on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/36164#issuecomment-1069799912

Comment:
Yesterday, I suggested [doing](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/36165#issuecomment-1068754834):

```bash
# Template file for 'dash'
alternatives="
 sh:sh:/usr/bin/dash
 sh:sh.1:/usr/share/man/man1/dash.1"

# Template file for 'bash'
alternatives="
 sh:sh:/usr/bin/bash
 sh:sh.1:/usr/share/man/man1/bash.1"

# Template file for 'neovim'
alternatives="
  vi:vi:/usr/bin/nvim
  vi:vi.1:/usr/share/man/man1/nvim.1
```

I’ve updated the PR accordingly, to minimize any confusion.

I simply don’t recognize any level of logical consistency in the way Neovim is allowed to easily override `vim` on Void systems. There is no logical difference between allowing this and allowing `bash` to override `dash`. It’s simply not what most users want or expect, edge cases from Debian aside.