Github messages for voidlinux
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tornaria <tornaria@users.noreply.github.com>
To: ml@inbox.vuxu.org
Subject: Re: lrcalc: update to 2.1, rebuild sagemath-9.5
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 22:35:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220318213538.ds7JyjKU26s7p9ql9sTNSx2zukKuy0PTaRHhJNu-FaY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gh-mailinglist-notifications-41a7ca26-5023-4802-975b-f1789d68868e-void-packages-36209@inbox.vuxu.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 938 bytes --]

New comment by tornaria on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/36209#issuecomment-1072834030

Comment:
> depends+="eclib-devel flintlib-devel gcc-fortran gd-devel gsl-devel libpng-devel linbox-devel m4ri-devel mpfr-devel ntl-devel pari-devel python3-devel"

Granted, there are some large packages there. I'd like to have a look at what extent these are used in sage, etc. Ideally there should be a feature flag that indicates that a doctest only works when a working C compiler is installed, etc. That needs to be done with upstream.

What would happen to doctesting in CI? I guess that would still work since it's done in the masterdir...

Let me think about it... We need some good workflow to play with bare-bones void so we can test dependencies are ok, because an xbps-src chroot always contain gcc, etc. which will may not be installed (gcc is pulled in as a dependency of gcc-fortran).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-18 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-18 18:29 [PR PATCH] " tornaria
2022-03-18 19:45 ` dkwo
2022-03-18 20:24 ` tornaria
2022-03-18 20:41 ` dkwo
2022-03-18 21:08 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " tornaria
2022-03-18 21:35 ` tornaria [this message]
2022-03-19  8:14 ` dkwo
2022-04-04  1:31 ` tornaria
2022-04-04  1:31 ` [PR PATCH] [Closed]: " tornaria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220318213538.ds7JyjKU26s7p9ql9sTNSx2zukKuy0PTaRHhJNu-FaY@z \
    --to=tornaria@users.noreply.github.com \
    --cc=ml@inbox.vuxu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).