New comment by 0x5c on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/36253#issuecomment-1075668575

Comment:
It seems to me it would be more helpful to direct users to the full search, or accept that most of them (especially the new packages) don't meet the quality requirements (of package and or PR), on top of being outdated, and wouldn't be a good base for new PRs. Keep in mind it's not "the old PRs" but inactive PRs which this target; the old but still active PRs generally meet quality requirements and are kept updated by their authors.