Re: [PR PATCH] [Updated] jetbrains-jdk-bin: update to 11.0.14b2043.14.

[2asoft <2asoft@users.noreply.github.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 519 bytes --]

There is an updated pull request by 2asoft against master on the void-packages repository

https://github.com/2asoft/void-packages 2asoft/jb_update_jdk
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/36195

jetbrains-jdk-bin: update to 11.0.14b2043.14.
#### Testing the changes
- I tested the changes in this PR: **briefly**


#### Local build testing
- I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (x86_64-LIBC)


A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/36195.patch is attached

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-2asoft/jb_update_jdk-36195.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1292 bytes --]

From cab72d466e245159d8ddbf3efa8c7f73783d0387 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anton Afanasyev <1157248+2asoft@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 21:43:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] jetbrains-jdk-bin: update to 11.0.14.1b2043.17.

---
 srcpkgs/jetbrains-jdk-bin/template | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/srcpkgs/jetbrains-jdk-bin/template b/srcpkgs/jetbrains-jdk-bin/template
index b2f4fe780d19..1f428e05bd3a 100644
--- a/srcpkgs/jetbrains-jdk-bin/template
+++ b/srcpkgs/jetbrains-jdk-bin/template
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Template file for 'jetbrains-jdk-bin'
 pkgname=jetbrains-jdk-bin
-version=11.0.13b1890.3
+version=11.0.14.1b2043.17
 revision=1
 archs="x86_64"
 wrksrc="jbr"
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ homepage="https://github.com/JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime"
 _jdk_ver=${version%b*}
 _jdk_build=${version#*b}
 distfiles="https://cache-redirector.jetbrains.com/intellij-jbr/jbr_jcef-${_jdk_ver//\./_}-linux-x64-b${_jdk_build}.tar.gz"
-checksum=6dc1208c486ed023ddd9f79f66f099304cd6785895d4e782aaefe0603f47e621
+checksum=2c5b7398acb2b718cbdd8327e4c77e52b131fdf3424fee03d0c51afb3b315c10
 # This JDK appears to link to libs that do not exist, but functions well even in their absence.
 # Best guess is that they are optional. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 noverifyrdeps=yes