New comment by 0x5c on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/36411#issuecomment-1099626871

Comment:
> Remarks from paper42 to replace quality requirement with link and to not tag are right. Otherwise quite fine for me.

That text had to be edited to make it more comprehensible to package requesters, since the manual's wording is heavily intended for those who are writing a template, and mentions things like `If you believe you have an exception, start a PR and make an argument for why that particular piece of software, while not meeting any of the following requirements, is a good candidate for the Void packages system.`, which seems fairly nonconstructive in the context of a package request.