[ISSUE] flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[ISSUE] flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[voidlinux-github]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 749 bytes --]

New issue by StreetStrider on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053

Description:
It seemes that `flatpak-builder` misses deps:
`elfutils`, `patch`.

I've tried to use flatpak-builder. It's hard to distinguish between errors related to build process and to package itself, but it seemes, that this deps are inherent to any build process with flatpak. Threads on the internet confirms that in other systems flatpak depends on them.

### System
* xuname: Void 5.2.21_1 x86_64 GenuineIntel notuptodate rrFF
* package:  flatpak-builder-1.0.9_1

### Steps to reproduce the behavior
Build with `flatpak-builder` which involves anything more complex than building an empty app and involves patches.

Re: flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[kawaiiamber]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 220 bytes --]

New comment by kawaiiamber on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053#issuecomment-757003365

Comment:
> Threads on the internet confirms that in other systems flatpak 
Where?

Re: flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[kawaiiamber]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 222 bytes --]

New comment by kawaiiamber on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053#issuecomment-757003365

Comment:
> Threads on the internet confirms that in other systems flatpak 

Where?

Re: flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[kawaiiamber]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 237 bytes --]

New comment by kawaiiamber on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053#issuecomment-757003365

Comment:
> Threads on the internet confirms that in other systems flatpak depends on them

Where?

Re: flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[StreetStrider]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 456 bytes --]

New comment by StreetStrider on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053#issuecomment-761876116

Comment:
If you google something like `flatpak-builder elfutils` you see them. Some of them: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak-builder/issues/92, https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak-builder/issues/261, https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/polari/-/issues/34.

https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/flatpak-builder/

Re: flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[StreetStrider]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 507 bytes --]

New comment by StreetStrider on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053#issuecomment-761876116

Comment:
If you google something like `flatpak-builder elfutils` you'll see them. Some of them: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak-builder/issues/92, https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak-builder/issues/261, https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/polari/-/issues/34.

arch package depends on both elfutils and patch https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/flatpak-builder/

Re: flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[kawaiiamber]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 268 bytes --]

New comment by kawaiiamber on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053#issuecomment-761877371

Comment:
I don't use flatpak; if you think there are missing dependencies, I'd go ahead and make a PR to add them to the template.

Re: flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[kawaiiamber]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 279 bytes --]

New comment by kawaiiamber on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053#issuecomment-761877371

Comment:
I don't know flatpak that well; if you think there are missing dependencies, I'd go ahead and make a PR to add them to the template.

Re: flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[StreetStrider]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 310 bytes --]

New comment by StreetStrider on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053#issuecomment-761877696

Comment:
I don't know flatpak well either. I just noticed that the only time I've tried to use it there was an issues, so I think that may be worth mentioning in tracker.

Re: flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[thegarlynch]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 187 bytes --]

New comment by thegarlynch on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053#issuecomment-819661490

Comment:
Please make the PR, it happen to me also

Re: flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[github-actions]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 293 bytes --]

New comment by github-actions[bot] on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053#issuecomment-1099786844

Comment:
Issues become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that.  If this issue is still relevant bump it or assign it.

Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[github-actions]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 752 bytes --]

Closed issue by StreetStrider on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053

Description:
It seemes that `flatpak-builder` misses deps:
`elfutils`, `patch`.

I've tried to use flatpak-builder. It's hard to distinguish between errors related to build process and to package itself, but it seemes, that this deps are inherent to any build process with flatpak. Threads on the internet confirms that in other systems flatpak depends on them.

### System
* xuname: Void 5.2.21_1 x86_64 GenuineIntel notuptodate rrFF
* package:  flatpak-builder-1.0.9_1

### Steps to reproduce the behavior
Build with `flatpak-builder` which involves anything more complex than building an empty app and involves patches.

Re: flatpak-builder: missing deps?

[kawaiiamber]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 217 bytes --]

New comment by kawaiiamber on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/16053#issuecomment-1112927632

Comment:
> Please make the PR, it happen to me also

Is this still an issue?