New review comment by 0x5c on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/36950#discussion_r865513293

Comment:
The current behaviour includes the file and line number in the log message, while the annotation would eat it (the file and line only being visible in the form of the inline annotation itself.

There's a couple of options
1. Remove the plain print and make the message of the annotation the same as the raw lint line (the annotation message would contain the filename [and line] even when inline)
2. Keep as is
3. Not change the annotation and remove the raw print (filename [and line] never shown anywhere)

In all 3 the inline annotations are correctly placed

Imo option 3 is fine but I essentially didn't want to "break" the current behaviour without input from reviewers. The duplicated print is easier to notice than the lack of filename[/line] in the log.