New comment by chexum on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37416#issuecomment-1170175736

Comment:
> We generally use upstream names, anything wrong with using `guestfs-tools`?

Even the internal library common to `libguestfs` and `guestfs-tools` is residing in `libguestfs-common`. Perhaps the vendor name was chosen to only have a name that's shorter to type, but it's all still for the libguestfs family.  Both the two major distributions use the name `libguestfs-tools` as well.  This way it could reduce the confusion of both new users, to learn about the package, and users from other distributions, to find the package they know.