New comment by sgn on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37804#issuecomment-1174546869

Comment:
> It's a bit harsh to assume that and say it like that

Sorry, but I only assume that because you wrote the tool and try to submit this tool to multiple distro.

> but ok, I guess security tools are not welcome on this distro.

Security tools are very welcomed in this distro. In facts, all tools which will be used by our users will be welcomed.
However, security tools should go under auditing before introduction. And tools should be introduced by users who will USE the tools ON Void Linux. I can see the former (as you wrote it) but not the latter (noone specifically asked for it).

> But if you think too few users will use it, it's not necessary needed to include and build it by default.

I think NO Void Linux users will use it. Evident: noone ever asked for it, except you, who won't use Void Linux.

> I see there are [restricted repositories](https://docs.voidlinux.org/xbps/repositories/restricted.html) on Void so they are included in void-packages but need to be built manually by users.

Maintaining a software also costs. Build and distribute are easy, since machine are cheap. Human cost is not.

> Else I guess I'll have to submit it to non-official [VUR](https://github.com/vb-linux/VUR).

I only know VUR because of your comments.

> I'm new to Void and I'm discovering it, I took a lot of time to submit a PR and test it and reading the doc rather than opening a feature request issue. I was expecting a more welcoming answer even for a refusal.