Github messages for voidlinux
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ahesford <ahesford@users.noreply.github.com>
To: ml@inbox.vuxu.org
Subject: Re: [PR REVIEW] [RFC] use alternatives to manage initramfs regeneration
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 19:05:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220914170535.9QnFEj2-K7lhpp2HhWSMA9lf3dwN-coy_0hkK-Tp-rk@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gh-mailinglist-notifications-41a7ca26-5023-4802-975b-f1789d68868e-void-packages-39284@inbox.vuxu.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 680 bytes --]

New review comment by ahesford on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/39284#discussion_r971085307

Comment:
Yes and no. I was torn about adding an alternative here because it doesn't conflict in the same way as mkinitcpio/dracut, but presumably somebody interested in spitting out a UEFI bundle doesn't care about a separate initramfs in `/boot`. We could skip the alternative here and just install the hooks as they are now, or a user who wishes for both a separate initramfs and a UEFI bundle could manually link to the new hooks in `/usr/libexec`.

Motivation for this comes from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/39282.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-14 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-14 16:00 [PR PATCH] " ahesford
2022-09-14 16:25 ` CameronNemo
2022-09-14 16:38 ` [PR REVIEW] " CameronNemo
2022-09-14 17:05 ` ahesford [this message]
2022-09-14 17:07 ` ahesford
2022-09-14 19:15 ` [PR REVIEW] " dmarto
2022-09-15  1:29 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " ahesford
2022-09-15  1:29 ` [PR REVIEW] " ahesford
2022-09-15 10:26 ` classabbyamp
2022-09-18 17:55 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " ahesford
2022-09-18 18:39 ` ahesford
2022-09-18 18:49 ` ahesford
2022-09-18 18:57 ` ahesford
2022-09-18 18:58 ` ahesford
2022-09-19  8:19 ` thypon
2022-09-19  9:23 ` classabbyamp
2022-09-19 11:04 ` ahesford
2022-09-19 20:33 ` classabbyamp
2022-09-26 12:17 ` [PR PATCH] [Merged]: " ahesford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220914170535.9QnFEj2-K7lhpp2HhWSMA9lf3dwN-coy_0hkK-Tp-rk@z \
    --to=ahesford@users.noreply.github.com \
    --cc=ml@inbox.vuxu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).