From: tornaria <tornaria@users.noreply.github.com>
To: ml@inbox.vuxu.org
Subject: Re: [PR PATCH] [Updated] sagemath: fix for 32 bit architectures
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 18:49:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221214174952.6m3YO9Nu_WP5ikekr9C01UEUYb6r1rys2-EFQHKUzRU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gh-mailinglist-notifications-41a7ca26-5023-4802-975b-f1789d68868e-void-packages-41085@inbox.vuxu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1516 bytes --]
There is an updated pull request by tornaria against master on the void-packages repository
https://github.com/tornaria/void-packages sagemath
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/41085
sagemath: fix for 32 bit architectures
After the upgrade to python 3.11, sagemath is completely broken (it won't even start).
See: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33842#comment:130
This revbump adds a fix taken from that trac ticket (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33842#comment:137)
<!-- Uncomment relevant sections and delete options which are not applicable -->
#### Testing the changes
- I tested the changes in this PR: **YES**
<!--
#### New package
- This new package conforms to the [package requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#package-requirements): **YES**|**NO**
-->
<!-- Note: If the build is likely to take more than 2 hours, please add ci skip tag as described in
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration
and test at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build.
Ignore this section if this PR is not skipping CI.
-->
<!--
#### Local build testing
- I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
- aarch64-musl
- armv7l
- armv6l-musl
-->
A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/41085.patch is attached
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-sagemath-41085.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 10172 bytes --]
From ea202df0dc04663fa6c5f00200a4d6855798bd89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Gonzalo=20Tornar=C3=ADa?= <tornaria@cmat.edu.uy>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:51:34 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] sagemath: fix for 32 bit architectures
After the upgrade to python 3.11, sagemath is completely broken (it
won't even start).
See: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33842#comment:130
This revbump adds a fix taken from that trac ticket
(https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33842#comment:137)
---
.../trac-33842-04-python3.11_fix_32_bit.patch | 212 ++++++++++++++++++
srcpkgs/sagemath/template | 2 +-
2 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 srcpkgs/sagemath/patches/trac-33842-04-python3.11_fix_32_bit.patch
diff --git a/srcpkgs/sagemath/patches/trac-33842-04-python3.11_fix_32_bit.patch b/srcpkgs/sagemath/patches/trac-33842-04-python3.11_fix_32_bit.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4c26dfdb6843
--- /dev/null
+++ b/srcpkgs/sagemath/patches/trac-33842-04-python3.11_fix_32_bit.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+diff --git a/src/sage/arith/long.pxd b/src/sage/arith/long.pxd
+index b0c80f61480..1c9a53387a0 100644
+--- a/src/sage/arith/long.pxd
++++ b/src/sage/arith/long.pxd
+@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ cdef inline bint integer_check_long(x, long* value, int* err) except -1:
+ ....: if err == 0:
+ ....: return value
+ ....: elif err == ERR_OVERFLOW:
+- ....: raise OverflowError("integer_check_long: overflow")
++ ....: raise OverflowError(f"integer_check_long: overflow ({x})")
+ ....: elif err == ERR_TYPE:
+ ....: raise TypeError("integer_check_long: wrong type")
+ ....: elif err == ERR_INDEX:
+@@ -136,24 +136,23 @@ cdef inline bint integer_check_long(x, long* value, int* err) except -1:
+ ....: def long_max():
+ ....: return smallInteger(LONG_MAX)
+ ....: ''')
+- sage: types = (ZZ, QQ, int)
+ sage: L = [1, 12345, 10^9, 2^30, long_max()//9, long_max()//3, long_max()]
+ sage: L += [-x for x in L] + [0, long_min()]
+ sage: for v in L:
+- ....: for t in (Integer, int):
++ ....: for t in (Integer, int, QQ):
+ ....: assert check_long(t(v)) == v
+ sage: check_long(2^100)
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+- OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow
++ OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow (...)
+ sage: check_long(long_max() + 1)
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+- OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow
++ OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow (...)
+ sage: check_long(long_min() - 1)
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+- OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow
++ OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow (...)
+ sage: check_long("hello")
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+@@ -162,6 +161,36 @@ cdef inline bint integer_check_long(x, long* value, int* err) except -1:
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+ TypeError: integer_check_long: bad __index__
++
++ Repeat the overflow tests with python integers:
++
++ sage: check_long(int(2^100))
++ Traceback (most recent call last):
++ ...
++ OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow (...)
++ sage: check_long(int(long_max() + 1))
++ Traceback (most recent call last):
++ ...
++ OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow (...)
++ sage: check_long(int(long_min() - 1))
++ Traceback (most recent call last):
++ ...
++ OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow (...)
++
++ And again with rationals:
++
++ sage: check_long(QQ(2^100))
++ Traceback (most recent call last):
++ ...
++ OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow (...)
++ sage: check_long(QQ(long_max() + 1))
++ Traceback (most recent call last):
++ ...
++ OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow (...)
++ sage: check_long(QQ(long_min() - 1))
++ Traceback (most recent call last):
++ ...
++ OverflowError: integer_check_long: overflow (...)
+ """
+ cdef int c = integer_check_long_py(x, value, err)
+ if c:
+@@ -193,35 +222,93 @@ cdef inline long dig(const digit* D, int n):
+
+ cdef inline bint integer_check_long_py(x, long* value, int* err):
+ """
+- Part of ``integer_check_long`` in ``long.pxd``, checking only for
+- Python objects of type ``int`` and ``long``. See that function for
+- documentation and tests.
++ Return whether ``x`` is a python object of type ``int``.
++
++ If possible, compute the value of this integer as C long and store
++ it in ``*value``.
++
++ Errors are returned as an error indicator ``*err`` (without raising
++ any Python exception).
++
++ Possible errors when returning ``True``:
++
++ - ``0``: ``x`` was successfully converted to a C long and its value
++ is stored in ``*value``.
++
++ - ``ERR_OVERFLOW``: ``x`` is a python object of type ``int`` but
++ too large to store in a C long.
++
++ Possible errors when returning ``False``:
++
++ - ``ERR_TYPE``: ``x`` is not a python object of type ``int``.
++
++ EXAMPLES:
++
++ We create a pure Python wrapper of this function::
++
++ sage: cython(''' # optional - sage.misc.cython
++ ....: from sage.arith.long cimport *
++ ....: def check_long_py(x):
++ ....: cdef long value
++ ....: cdef int err
++ ....: cdef bint c = integer_check_long_py(x, &value, &err)
++ ....: if c:
++ ....: if err == 0:
++ ....: return value
++ ....: elif err == ERR_OVERFLOW:
++ ....: return f"Overflow ({x})"
++ ....: elif err == ERR_TYPE:
++ ....: return f"Bad type ({x})"
++ ....: return f"This should never happen ({x})"
++ ....: from libc.limits cimport LONG_MIN, LONG_MAX
++ ....: def long_min():
++ ....: return LONG_MIN
++ ....: def long_max():
++ ....: return LONG_MAX
++ ....: ''')
++ sage: L = [1, 12345, 10^9, 2^30, long_max()//9, long_max()//3, long_max()]
++ sage: L += [-x for x in L] + [0, long_min()]
++ sage: for v in L:
++ ....: assert check_long_py(int(v)) == v
++ sage: check_long_py(int(2^100))
++ 'Overflow (...)'
++ sage: check_long_py(int(long_max() + 1))
++ 'Overflow (...)'
++ sage: check_long_py(int(long_min() - 1))
++ 'Overflow (...)'
++ sage: check_long_py(389)
++ 'Bad type (...)'
++ sage: check_long_py("hello")
++ 'Bad type (...)'
++ sage: check_long_py(2/3)
++ 'Bad type (...)'
+ """
+- if not isinstance(x, long):
+- if isinstance(x, int):
+- # This can happen only on Python 2
+- value[0] = PyInt_AS_LONG(x)
+- err[0] = 0
+- return 1
++ if not isinstance(x, int):
+ err[0] = ERR_TYPE
+ return 0
+
+- # x is a Python "long" (called "int" on Python 3)
++ # x is a Python "int" (aka PyLongObject or py_long in cython)
+ cdef const digit* D = (<py_long>x).ob_digit
+ cdef Py_ssize_t size = Py_SIZE(x)
+
+- # We assume that PyLong_SHIFT is 15 on a 32-bit system and 30 on a
+- # 64-bit system. This is not guaranteed by Python, but it is the
+- # default configuration.
++ # We assume PyLong_SHIFT <= BITS_IN_LONG <= 3 * PyLong_SHIFT.
++ # This is true in all the default configurations:
++ # - BITS_IN_LONG = 63, PyLong_SHIFT = 30
++ # - BITS_IN_LONG = 31, PyLong_SHIFT = 15 (python <= 3.10)
++ # - BITS_IN_LONG = 31, PyLong_SHIFT = 30 (new in python 3.11)
++ # cf. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33842#comment:130
+ #
+- # This way, we know that 1 and 2 digits certainly fit in a C long
+- # and 4 or more digits never fit. For 3 digits, we need an explicit
+- # overflow check.
++ # This way, we know that 1 digit certainly fits in a C long
++ # and 4 or more digits never fit.
++ # For 2 or 3 digits, we need an explicit overflow check.
+ cdef int BITS_IN_LONG = 8 * sizeof(long) - 1
+- if not (2 * PyLong_SHIFT <= BITS_IN_LONG < 4 * PyLong_SHIFT):
+- raise AssertionError
++ if not (PyLong_SHIFT <= BITS_IN_LONG <= 3 * PyLong_SHIFT):
++ raise AssertionError(
++ f"PyLong_SHIFT = {PyLong_SHIFT}, "
++ f"BITS_IN_LONG = {BITS_IN_LONG}")
+
+ cdef long lead
++ cdef long lead_2_overflow = (<long>1) << (BITS_IN_LONG - PyLong_SHIFT)
+ cdef long lead_3_overflow = (<long>1) << (BITS_IN_LONG - 2 * PyLong_SHIFT)
+ if size == 0:
+ value[0] = 0
+@@ -233,9 +320,20 @@ cdef inline bint integer_check_long_py(x, long* value, int* err):
+ value[0] = -dig(D, 0)
+ err[0] = 0
+ elif size == 2:
++ if BITS_IN_LONG < 2 * PyLong_SHIFT and D[1] >= lead_2_overflow:
++ err[0] = ERR_OVERFLOW
++ return 1
+ value[0] = dig(D, 0) + dig(D, 1)
+ err[0] = 0
+ elif size == -2:
++ if BITS_IN_LONG < 2 * PyLong_SHIFT and D[1] >= lead_2_overflow:
++ if D[0] == 0 and D[1] == lead_2_overflow:
++ # Special case for LONG_MIN
++ value[0] = (<long>-1) << BITS_IN_LONG
++ err[0] = 0
++ else:
++ err[0] = ERR_OVERFLOW
++ return 1
+ value[0] = -(dig(D, 0) + dig(D, 1))
+ err[0] = 0
+ elif size == 3:
diff --git a/srcpkgs/sagemath/template b/srcpkgs/sagemath/template
index 0cc79bda923b..74445c3aa8c1 100644
--- a/srcpkgs/sagemath/template
+++ b/srcpkgs/sagemath/template
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# Template file for 'sagemath'
pkgname=sagemath
version=9.7
-revision=3
+revision=4
build_wrksrc=pkgs/sagemath-standard
build_style=python3-module
_bindir=/usr/lib/sagemath/$version/bin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-14 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-14 14:08 [PR PATCH] " tornaria
2022-12-14 16:15 ` tornaria
2022-12-14 17:49 ` tornaria [this message]
2022-12-18 11:36 ` [PR PATCH] [Merged]: " paper42
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221214174952.6m3YO9Nu_WP5ikekr9C01UEUYb6r1rys2-EFQHKUzRU@z \
--to=tornaria@users.noreply.github.com \
--cc=ml@inbox.vuxu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).