There's a closed pull request on the void-packages repository

binutils: update to 2.39. 
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/39312

Description:
<!-- Uncomment relevant sections and delete options which are not applicable -->

#### Testing the changes
- I tested the changes in this PR: **briefly**

[ci skip]

Most of the testing for this was done as a part of the [gcc12 PR](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/34902), this was split on request.

There were some api changes in libfd, the following packages were tested to build against binutils-devel:
- [x] oprofile
- [x] prelink-cross
- [x] kcov
- [x] linux-tools
- [x] distcc
- [x] chroot-distcc
- [x] sbsigntool
- [ ] llvm12 (I can't remember if I tested it with binutils 2.39 or just 2.38, building it takes forever, but it should be fine since afaict it doesn't use libbfd or `dis-asm.h`)
- [x] rpm (doesn't actually use binutils-devel but it is listed in the makedepends, builds fine without it)

Please test this PR before merging.

Closes: https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/39291

<!--
#### New package
- This new package conforms to the [package requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#package-requirements): **YES**|**NO**
-->

<!-- Note: If the build is likely to take more than 2 hours, please add ci skip tag as described in
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration
and test at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build.
Ignore this section if this PR is not skipping CI.
-->
<!--
#### Local build testing
- I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
  - aarch64-musl
  - armv7l
  - armv6l-musl
-->