From: atweiden <atweiden@users.noreply.github.com>
To: ml@inbox.vuxu.org
Subject: Re: pinebookpro: kernel: update to 6.1.9, base: drop firmware dependency, use ALSA UCM
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 05:25:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230217042521.Y267CGwZ-6ZGTj0Jj9SsT3vhlCL5l7DixppGM2Rybts@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gh-mailinglist-notifications-41a7ca26-5023-4802-975b-f1789d68868e-void-packages-41062@inbox.vuxu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1842 bytes --]
New comment by atweiden on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/41062#issuecomment-1434086584
Comment:
@CameronNemo: just to clarify, the patches at [SvenKiljan/archlinuxarm-pbp-packages](https://github.com/SvenKiljan/archlinuxarm-pbp-packages) aren’t arbitrary. They’re the same patches new pbps are shipped with as part of Manjaro. From what I can tell, Manjaro is currently, and has been, actively upstreaming their own patches. Surely you’d agree Pine64/Manjaro is in an excellent position to *continue* upstreaming their own patches, and that the lack of a Manjaro patch being upstreamed at present doesn’t rule out its being upstreamed in the future, irrespective of my or anyone else’s at Void’s actions.
Is your position that the pinebookpro-kernel template should never include any patches beyond those made to our linuxX.Y templates? If so, why are we using the pinebookpro-kernel template, in the first place?
And if your position is that *Manjaro*’s patches need to be either upstreamed or discarded, why are 5 out of 6 patches in the pinebookpro-kernel template now seemingly from a nearly 2-year old version of Manjaro? It would be understandable if those patches weren’t your doing; I just hope you can see the reason for my confusion in regards to the consistency of your stated position. Am I misunderstanding something?
Because you asked, here’s one example of a usability issue solved by one of the latest pbp-specific Manjaro-origin patches:
> MicroSD card slot in the Pinebook Pro is located on a separate daughterboard that's connected to the mainboard using a rather long flat cable. The resulting signal degradation causes many perfectly fine microSD cards not to work in the Pinebook Pro, which is a common source of frustration among the owners.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 16:12 [PR PATCH] pinebookpro-kernel: update to 6.1.0 CameronNemo
2022-12-21 18:58 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] pinebookpro-kernel: update to 6.1.1 CameronNemo
2023-02-06 2:29 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-06 2:32 ` pinebookpro: kernel: update to 6.1.1, base: drop firmware dependency, use ALSA UCM CameronNemo
2023-02-06 12:18 ` petersen77
2023-02-06 15:46 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-06 15:48 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-08 21:54 ` pinebookpro: kernel: update to 6.1.9, " petersen77
2023-02-14 20:59 ` [PR PATCH] [Merged]: " paper42
2023-02-14 23:04 ` atweiden
2023-02-15 1:11 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-15 3:18 ` atweiden
2023-02-15 16:29 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-15 16:29 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-16 3:57 ` atweiden
2023-02-16 5:26 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-16 6:56 ` atweiden
2023-02-16 9:14 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-17 4:25 ` atweiden [this message]
2023-02-17 5:30 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-17 5:30 ` CameronNemo
2023-02-17 19:45 ` atweiden
2023-02-17 22:53 ` CameronNemo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230217042521.Y267CGwZ-6ZGTj0Jj9SsT3vhlCL5l7DixppGM2Rybts@z \
--to=atweiden@users.noreply.github.com \
--cc=ml@inbox.vuxu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).