New comment by gc-user on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/44551#issuecomment-1611611952

Comment:
I'm not sure you understand what symptom I described in the initial bug report.
Making a setting invalid by deliberately ignoring the correct placement of that setting in the respective file will make the corresponding service ignore that setting. This has neither anything to do with what I reported as symptom nor with the package which I reported being the seeming culprit when updating to the current version. That package most probably doesn't even read (or see or know about) the settings file of the other package.