New review comment by ahesford on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/44465#discussion_r1256680845

Comment:
The template you reference specifies `x86_64* i686*`, which includes musl variants; your spec restricts the package to glibc only. Is there some reason this package can't build on musl?

I don't know why the other template doesn't support the cross-built archs; it would be nice to understand if that was a fundamental restriction or a CBA cop-out.