New comment by ahesford on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/45365#issuecomment-1690888958

Comment:
General thoughts:
1. Should `zfs-lts` and its subpackages  provide or replace (or both) the equivalent non-LTS packages? This might support a smoother replacement experience for users.
2. I wonder if the META file should be a `conf_file` only for `aarch64`. Configuration files have some warts like the installation of original copies alongside their modified versions, so we can limit the damage to where it's needed.