New comment by Duncaen on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/45892#issuecomment-1704965946 Comment: > It's awesome that some chatter in a non officially logged IRC chat can create a lot of chaos /s, the communication process failed and it wont be changed magically, this will not be the last time. Also this wonderful new precedent will be used in the future, like how a bad action was used to justify the crypto removal PR. Even if after the fact it was "accepted" that it wasn't good. I gave this one a heart because they provided an example [#44422 (comment)](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/44422#issuecomment-1659081991) > > Also the claim in the PR opening comment is false, not all the PRs referenced where dead or tiny unimportant projects. #43702 #44133 I am so glad that was so well inspected before approval. /s > Any how thank you for insulting me directly, its so nice lol! Your doing a good job adding to the list of quality interactions with the void package maintainers /s Awesome another made up bad interaction you can fit your narrative. > So Void is a not a general purpose operating system and is instead a playpen for only the stuff a few people find interesting? Merging packages that are going to be build on void linux build servers and are in the official , where when they don't get actively maintained anymore, need rebuilds when dependencies are updated are merged at discretion of the void team, what a shocker.