New comment by zdykstra on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/45365#issuecomment-1711831942

Comment:
> General thoughts:
> 
> 1. Should `zfs-lts` and its subpackages  provide or replace (or both) the equivalent non-LTS packages? This might support a smoother replacement experience for users.

Either/or is fine with me. 

> 2. I wonder if the META file should be a `conf_file` only for `aarch64`. Configuration files have some warts like the installation of original copies alongside their modified versions, so we can limit the damage to where it's needed.

That's probably a good call.

With ZFS 2.2.0 RC4 out, upstream is probably close to a full release. Thoughts on these two items, @Vaelatern ?