New comment by dkwo on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/46293#issuecomment-1760304027

Comment:
No worries. Here 's my src/autoconf-variables.lisp:
```
$ cat masterdir/builddir/maxima-5.47.0/src/autoconf-variables.lisp 
; -*- Lisp -*-
(in-package :maxima)

(defparameter *autoconf-prefix* "/usr")
(defparameter *autoconf-exec_prefix* "/usr")
(defparameter *autoconf-package* "maxima")
(defparameter *autoconf-version* "5.47.0")
(defparameter *autoconf-libdir* "/usr/lib64")
(defparameter *autoconf-libexecdir* "/usr/libexec")
(defparameter *autoconf-datadir* "/usr/share")
(defparameter *autoconf-infodir* "/usr/share/info")
(defparameter *autoconf-host* "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu")
;; This variable is kept for backwards compatibility reasons:
;; We seem to be in the fortunate position that we sometimes need to check for windows.
;; But at least until dec 2015 we didn't need to check for a specific windows flavour.
(defparameter *autoconf-win32* "false")
(defparameter *autoconf-windows* "false")
(defparameter *autoconf-ld-flags* "-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,--as-needed    ")

;; This will be T if this was a lisp-only build
(defparameter *autoconf-lisp-only-build* (eq t 'nil))
 
(defparameter *maxima-source-root* "/builddir/maxima-5.47.0")
(defparameter *maxima-default-layout-autotools* "true")
```

Do you think it makes sense to also upstream this patch? https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/srcpkgs/maxima/patches/handle-multiple-ldflags.patch

Actually, could this patch be creating troubles? https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/srcpkgs/maxima/patches/use-shared-library.patch