There is an updated pull request by mhmdanas against master on the void-packages repository

https://github.com/mhmdanas/void-packages exiv2-0.28.0
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/46838

exiv2: update to 0.28.0.
<!-- Uncomment relevant sections and delete options which are not applicable -->

#### Testing the changes
- I tested the changes in this PR: **briefly**

TODO:
- [x] Fix `gwenview`'s failed checks (not really fixed but the exact same tests fail on master as well)
- [ ] `test_exiv2` fails for `libextractor`

@Johnnynator ufraw has been [unmaintained since December 2016](https://sourceforge.net/p/ufraw/discussion/434060/thread/30b4249b/), and it doesn't build with this PR; here are the options:
- remove the package entirely
- replace it with the newer [nufraw](https://sourceforge.net/projects/nufraw/), which already has [an exiv 0.28.x patch floating around](https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/exiv2-error.patch?h=nufraw)
- patch it to build with this PR

What do you think?

<!--
#### New package
- This new package conforms to the [package requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTItest_exiv2NG.md#package-requirements): **YES**|**NO**
-->

<!-- Note: If the build is likely to take more than 2 hours, please add ci skip tag as described in
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#continuous-integration
and test at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build.
Ignore this section if this PR is not skipping CI.
-->
<!--
#### Local build testing
- I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC)
- I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
  - aarch64-musl
  - armv7l
  - armv6l-musl
-->


A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/46838.patch is attached