* Re: nsxiv checksum error
2023-12-11 3:07 [ISSUE] nsxiv checksum error rickalex21
@ 2023-12-11 8:41 ` classabbyamp
2023-12-11 14:55 ` rickalex21
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: classabbyamp @ 2023-12-11 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 361 bytes --]
New comment by classabbyamp on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/47684#issuecomment-1849562790
Comment:
could just be codeberg changing the way they generate those tarballs. could also be a retag. you could use diffoscope to compare the old and new tarballs (get the old from https://sources.voidlinux.org/nsxiv-32/)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: nsxiv checksum error
2023-12-11 3:07 [ISSUE] nsxiv checksum error rickalex21
2023-12-11 8:41 ` classabbyamp
@ 2023-12-11 14:55 ` rickalex21
2023-12-11 14:58 ` rickalex21
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rickalex21 @ 2023-12-11 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 184 bytes --]
New comment by rickalex21 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/47684#issuecomment-1850242408
Comment:
I don’t know what a diffoscope is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: nsxiv checksum error
2023-12-11 3:07 [ISSUE] nsxiv checksum error rickalex21
2023-12-11 8:41 ` classabbyamp
2023-12-11 14:55 ` rickalex21
@ 2023-12-11 14:58 ` rickalex21
2023-12-12 20:09 ` rickalex21
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rickalex21 @ 2023-12-11 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 188 bytes --]
New comment by rickalex21 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/47684#issuecomment-1850242408
Comment:
I will see if I can figure it out later.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: nsxiv checksum error
2023-12-11 3:07 [ISSUE] nsxiv checksum error rickalex21
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-11 14:58 ` rickalex21
@ 2023-12-12 20:09 ` rickalex21
2023-12-12 20:11 ` classabbyamp
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rickalex21 @ 2023-12-12 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 304 bytes --]
New comment by rickalex21 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/47684#issuecomment-1852729915
Comment:
@classabbyamp it looks like there are no differences?
I did:
diffoscope dir1 dir2
and also diff -qr
not sure why I’m getting different hashes ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: nsxiv checksum error
2023-12-11 3:07 [ISSUE] nsxiv checksum error rickalex21
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-12 20:09 ` rickalex21
@ 2023-12-12 20:11 ` classabbyamp
2023-12-12 20:32 ` rickalex21
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: classabbyamp @ 2023-12-12 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 302 bytes --]
New comment by classabbyamp on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/47684#issuecomment-1852732256
Comment:
i bet it's just metadata or compression differences. diffoscope knows how to diff archives, so you could diff the tarballs directly instead of extracting
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: nsxiv checksum error
2023-12-11 3:07 [ISSUE] nsxiv checksum error rickalex21
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-12 20:11 ` classabbyamp
@ 2023-12-12 20:32 ` rickalex21
2023-12-13 9:18 ` sgn
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rickalex21 @ 2023-12-12 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 218 bytes --]
New comment by rickalex21 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/47684#issuecomment-1852760140
Comment:
It gives me a weird comparison:
![](https://i.imgur.com/nULeZY6.png)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: nsxiv checksum error
2023-12-11 3:07 [ISSUE] nsxiv checksum error rickalex21
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-12 20:32 ` rickalex21
@ 2023-12-13 9:18 ` sgn
2023-12-13 9:24 ` sgn
2023-12-13 9:25 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " sgn
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2023-12-13 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 366 bytes --]
New comment by sgn on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/47684#issuecomment-1853540980
Comment:
> Format-specific differences are supported for Gzipped files but no file-specific differences were detected;
They're the same. Probably because of https://lore.kernel.org/git/a812a664-67ea-c0ba-599f-cb79e2d96694@gmail.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: nsxiv checksum error
2023-12-11 3:07 [ISSUE] nsxiv checksum error rickalex21
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-13 9:18 ` sgn
@ 2023-12-13 9:24 ` sgn
2023-12-13 9:25 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " sgn
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2023-12-13 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 870 bytes --]
New comment by sgn on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/47684#issuecomment-1853540980
Comment:
> Format-specific differences are supported for Gzipped files but no file-specific differences were detected;
They're the same. Probably because of https://lore.kernel.org/git/a812a664-67ea-c0ba-599f-cb79e2d96694@gmail.com/
$ sha256sum old/v32.tar.gz <(zcat old/v32.tar.gz) \
new/v32.tar.gz <(zcat new/v32.tar.gz)
09d1d72b3cbcf17a04e26beb5e81acc9495aaba1f8f1be907bdcd8e4e3007db3 old/v32.tar.gz
4952f27cc17a704c88d2f0bbd0e937018ea6545e0ce5bba26cb6578625aa597b /proc/self/fd/12
49ef1eb775ef6c34f55dada7a3f446c9c5c6773c9e208509ffef27a656338a90 new/v32.tar.gz
4952f27cc17a704c88d2f0bbd0e937018ea6545e0ce5bba26cb6578625aa597b /proc/self/fd/13
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] nsxiv checksum error
2023-12-11 3:07 [ISSUE] nsxiv checksum error rickalex21
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-13 9:24 ` sgn
@ 2023-12-13 9:25 ` sgn
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: sgn @ 2023-12-13 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1030 bytes --]
Closed issue by rickalex21 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/47684
Description:
### Is this a new report?
Yes
### System Info
Void 6.5.13_1 x86_64 GenuineIntel uptodate rFFF
### Package(s) Affected
nsxiv 32
### Does a report exist for this bug with the project's home (upstream) and/or another distro?
No.
### Expected behaviour
Build the package without errors.
### Actual behaviour
I think the checksum may need to be updated?
template file updated by me to work:
```text
checksum=49ef1eb775ef6c34f55dada7a3f446c9c5c6773c9e208509ffef27a656338a90
# 12/10/2023 They have not updated the checksum?
#checksum=09d1d72b3cbcf17a04e26beb5e81acc9495aaba1f8f1be907bdcd8e4e3007db3
```
ERROR as the template file is right now:
```text
=> ERROR: SHA256 mismatch for 'v32.tar.gz:'
49ef1eb775ef6c34f55dada7a3f446c9c5c6773c9e208509ffef27a656338a90
=> ERROR: nsxiv-32_1: couldn't verify distfiles, exiting...
```
### Steps to reproduce
Try building with xbps-src.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread