From: tornaria <tornaria@users.noreply.github.com>
To: ml@inbox.vuxu.org
Subject: Re: python3-scipy: update to 1.12.0.
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 13:49:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240122124915.0DBFE246DD@inbox.vuxu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gh-mailinglist-notifications-41a7ca26-5023-4802-975b-f1789d68868e-void-packages-48317@inbox.vuxu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1254 bytes --]
New comment by tornaria on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/48317#issuecomment-1903939556
Comment:
Seems ok, scipy passed check in all arches.
Failure in i686 is one sagemath test, seems transient and completely unrelated to scipy, a timeout in:
```
...
sage: R.<x> = PolynomialRing(GF(65537), implementation="FLINT") ## line 701 ##
sage: f = R.random_element(9973) * R.random_element(10007) ## line 702 ##
sage: alarm(0.5); f.factor() ## line 703 ##
```
Most probably the signal got lost, I've seen this in the past. The test looks stupid but I think it's there to make sure `f.factor()` can be interrupted (say, by hitting ctrl-C, if that signal gets lots one can hit ctrl-C again ofc).
Running the scipy testsuite in CI seems ok, in our three arches with check:
```
== 45225 passed, 2466 skipped, 147 xfailed, 14 xpassed in 1619.82s (0:26:59) ===
== 44982 passed, 2334 skipped, 550 xfailed, 14 xpassed in 1765.55s (0:29:25) ===
== 45224 passed, 2467 skipped, 147 xfailed, 14 xpassed in 1395.96s (0:23:15) ===
```
It's weird it takes 26 minutes in CI, 36 minutes in my 8 core desktop, and 1 hour (walltime!) in my 36 core workstation, it seems some tests are scaled by the number of cores.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 3:49 [PR PATCH] https://github.com/tornaria/void-packages/pull/new/scipy tornaria
2024-01-22 12:49 ` tornaria [this message]
2024-01-22 13:10 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] python3-scipy: update to 1.12.0 tornaria
2024-01-22 13:16 ` tornaria
2024-01-23 19:48 ` [PR PATCH] [Closed]: " ahesford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240122124915.0DBFE246DD@inbox.vuxu.org \
--to=tornaria@users.noreply.github.com \
--cc=ml@inbox.vuxu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).