New comment by nonchip on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/41388#issuecomment-1925687834

Comment:
@okawo80085 i'm rather positive that digging up already ruled out or clearly established things in a bunch of individual unedited spammy posts with *less* research than above won't bring us further, please scroll next time. DT_HASH has been beaten to death and back now, and literally the 2nd post on this topic is about how flatpak works by not using our libc!

and why would we look at a 3rd party "patch to make arch libc work" if arch libc works plenty without it and is the thing we've been comparing to so far as the known good one? especially since that patch is completely unrelated and just to make that repo's build thingy happy by turning off some optional tests?