New comment by dataCobra on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/45578#issuecomment-1950236429

Comment:
> I do not think 66 will ever be offically integrated in voidlinux. I am maintaining the integration bits for me and anyone that wants to have a modern and capable initsystem/service manager in voidlinux.

I see where you want to go with that. These new packages ensure that you are the maintainer and no Void maintainer need to worry about tinkering. With that new knowledge I endorse that approach.

> Having said that, having these packages is the most clean way I know of changing init systems. See the effort for alternatives (that went nowhere): #29115

Thank you for the link to the PR. I can understand both sides and as stated above understand the approach you've chosen here.

> The ! is to ensure that the values do not stay in the environment. It is not absolutely necessary, but _nice to have_.

Oh good to know. Am I assuming correct that the values in the `[]` of each line in the [configuration file](https://git.obarun.org/obmods/boot-66serv/-/blob/master/configure?ref_type=heads) are showing the default value for the argument? If so, could we remove the `KEYMAP` argument in the template? Are the `TTY` and `TZ` arguments necessary for the building process?