New comment by ahesford on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/49293#issuecomment-2011911693

Comment:
I didn't realize that the Qt5 package was nothing more than a library. We have a [naming convention](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#libraries) that should be applied to any new subpackage here.
The new addition ought to be called `libqgpgmeqt6{,-devel}` or, because that's an illegible jumble of Q, P and G, maybe `libqgpgme-qt6{,-devel}`. 

Still, changing the name of the existing subpackage is a bad experience, because
1. We'll still have to carry the current name anyway, as a transitional dummy;
2. Presumably the Qt5 package should just be phased out at some point; and
3. Package renames should really only be considered when the upstream project actually changes its name, not to correct our own (longstanding) violations of convention.