From: hhvn-uk <hhvn-uk@users.noreply.github.com>
To: ml@inbox.vuxu.org
Subject: Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] rpi5-kernel-6.6.42_1 seems to believe it is actually 6.1.77_1
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:15:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240731161514.7899B24BEB@inbox.vuxu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gh-mailinglist-notifications-41a7ca26-5023-4802-975b-f1789d68868e-void-packages-51565@inbox.vuxu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3322 bytes --]
Closed issue by hhvn-uk on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/51565
Description:
### Is this a new report?
Yes
### System Info
Void 6.1.77_1 aarch64 Unknown uptodate rF
### Package(s) Affected
rpi5-kernel-6.6.42_1 (and some before it)
### Does a report exist for this bug with the project's home (upstream) and/or another distro?
_No response_
### Expected behaviour
I am not exactly sure when this started happening, but I know it started about a month ago, and I thought I'd wait a bit and see if a new kernel version would fix it.
I would expect that `uname -a` would give the installed kernel version, and the modules for the current kernel version would be loaded.
I would also expect wireguard to work.
### Actual behaviour
I updated all packages and then restarted the system.
```
$ uname -a
Linux hhvn.uk 6.1.77_1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Mar 7 16:31:46 UTC 2024 aarch64 GNU/Linux
```
I used xbps-query -f on rpi5-kernel and it seems that the kernel is stored at /boot/kernel8.img.
```
$ stat /boot/kernel8.img
File: /boot/kernel8.img
Size: 10587261 Blocks: 20680 IO Block: 2048 regular file
Device: 8,17 Inode: 1211 Links: 1
Access: (0755/-rwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Access: 2024-07-31 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
Modify: 2024-07-27 04:30:00.000000000 +0100
Change: 2024-07-27 04:30:00.000000000 +0100
Birth: 2024-07-31 10:25:19.240000000 +0100
```
Weirdly the modification date is shown as being in the past, however I also tried moving the file, and using xbps-install -f to replace it. After another reboot, the system *still* thinks it is running 6.1.77_1.
This means that modprobe is unable to load any modules during bootup:
```
modprobe: FATAL: Module ip_tables not found in directory /lib/modules/6.1.77_1
```
dmesg also reports the kernel being 6.1.77_1
```
$ doas cat /var/log/dmesg.log | grep 'Linux'
[ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x414fd0b1]
[ 0.000000] Linux version 6.1.77_1 (void-buildslave@void) (aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41) #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Mar 7 16:31:46 UTC 2024
[ 0.645518] pps_core: LinuxPPS API ver. 1 registered
[ 0.882320] usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux 6.1.77_1 xhci-hcd
[ 0.882594] usb usb2: Manufacturer: Linux 6.1.77_1 xhci-hcd
[ 0.883564] usb usb3: Manufacturer: Linux 6.1.77_1 xhci-hcd
[ 0.883788] usb usb4: Manufacturer: Linux 6.1.77_1 xhci-hcd
```
Whenever I attempt to bring up a wireguard interface, this happens:
```
$ doas wg-quick up hhvn
[#] ip link add hhvn type wireguard
Error: Unknown device type.
Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported
[#] ip link delete dev hhvn
Cannot find device "hhvn"
```
I would expect that even if the kernel *was* 6.1.77_1 it would still support wireguard? This whole situation is very strange to me.
I at one point attempted to use rpi-kernel instead, and ran into the same situation.
### Steps to reproduce
I don't have a spare rpi to test this out on.
I installed it via one of @classabbyamp's images.
I suppose install rpi5-kernel on an rpi5 and then check what uname outputs?
Happy to give any more info that may be relevant if this proves hard to reproduce.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 9:45 [ISSUE] " hhvn-uk
2024-07-31 14:56 ` Duncaen
2024-07-31 16:15 ` hhvn-uk [this message]
2024-07-31 16:15 ` hhvn-uk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240731161514.7899B24BEB@inbox.vuxu.org \
--to=hhvn-uk@users.noreply.github.com \
--cc=ml@inbox.vuxu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).