New comment by bugcrazy on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/51964#issuecomment-2346181164

Comment:
> So, while we are renaming the package, should we do it like upstream suggests? https://github.com/oils-for-unix/oils/wiki/Oils-Packaging-Guidelines

The definition itself is confusing, as there are two packages, one Python and one C, we should adopt more logical standards, this oils standard for package, is more correct.

> Okay, so this is the old Python-version, but there upstream says: https://www.oilshell.org/release/0.23.0/
> 
> > The oil tarball is the slow reference interpreter based on CPython.
> > Don't rename old distro packages. They can remain oil.
> > It's not worth packaging oil in new distros. It may be removed at some point.
> 
> So let's keep this (just adding the link is fine), and perhaps someone can contribute `oils-for-unix` instead?

Python version is slow, a few seconds, C++ version is slower than bash version.

Python version is more stable and tested, has a history of having fewer bugs.

Here is a speed test and some bugs of the C++ version:

https://github.com/oils-for-unix/oils/issues/1069