New issue by duncancmt-alt on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/25125

Description:
Yet another report in my "PACKAGE segfaults on aarch64-musl" series. See also #24783 #24785 and #24918 (more to come, I'm sure). I regret that I am posting this from a different account. I am currently locked out of my usual machine due to a bug in LVM2 (which I hope is unrelated to the issue at hand). See this thread on the lvm-linux mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/2020-September/msg00088.html and this bug open upstream: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882483

But hopefully that's all unrelated.

### System

* xuname:  
  `Void 5.7.0_1 aarch64-musl Unknown uptodate rFF`
* package:  
  `thin-provisioning-tools-0.8.5_1`

### Expected behavior
```
# thin_dump /dev/null
<no segfault, maybe an error message or something?>
```

### Actual behavior
```
# thin_dump /dev/null
Segmentation fault
```

### Steps to reproduce the behavior
See above

### Other remarks

I've [uploaded a tarball](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RnUFlSMmFph5JXxenDJ1PhuCLV9xelAc/view?usp=sharing) containing the relevant binary, shared libraries, and core dump. I regret that I cannot provide a backtrace, but `gdb` is broken on aarch64-musl (see #24785 ).

Something appears to be seriously wrong with aarch64-musl. If anyone could provide some insight into what's broken, I would be greatly appreciative. Otherwise, I think a reasonable person may conclude that despite documentation otherwise, aarch64-musl is *not* actually supported on void (or at least, it's barely usable what with how many broken packages there are)