Github messages for voidlinux
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
@ 2022-06-16  1:38 via
  2022-06-18 13:50 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " via
                   ` (14 more replies)
  0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: via @ 2022-06-16  1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 777 bytes --]

There is a new pull request by via against master on the void-packages repository

https://github.com/via/void-packages via/bump-cross-arm
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580

Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages

#### Testing the changes
- I tested the changes in this PR: YES
I tested this with my own personal armv7 projects.  Notably, the version currently in packages has a bug with LTO that makes it discard ISR functions/symbols inappropriately, making LTO useless for some embedded use cases.  This appears fixed in gcc 10.

#### Local build testing
- I built this PR locally for my native architecture, amd64/glibc



A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580.patch is attached

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-via/bump-cross-arm-37580.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2177 bytes --]

From b8b7aefe6efeffbb52ec6002a6101a503829265b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthew Via <via@matthewvia.info>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 21:23:48 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross
 packages

---
 srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils/template | 6 +++---
 srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc/template      | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils/template b/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils/template
index fd106a2c40a6..df1b3836061d 100644
--- a/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils/template
+++ b/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils/template
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 _triplet=arm-none-eabi
 _pkgname=binutils
 pkgname=cross-${_triplet}-${_pkgname}
-version=2.32
-revision=2
+version=2.35
+revision=1
 wrksrc="${_pkgname}-${version}"
 build_style=gnu-configure
 configure_args="
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ maintainer="Ivan Sokolov <ivan-p-sokolov@ya.ru>"
 license="GPL-3.0-or-later"
 homepage="https://www.gnu.org/software/${_pkgname}/"
 distfiles="${GNU_SITE}/${_pkgname}/${_pkgname}-${version}.tar.xz"
-checksum=0ab6c55dd86a92ed561972ba15b9b70a8b9f75557f896446c82e8b36e473ee04
+checksum=1b11659fb49e20e18db460d44485f09442c8c56d5df165de9461eb09c8302f85
 nocross=yes
 
 post_install() {
diff --git a/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc/template b/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc/template
index 3896f61322b5..161a88f314c2 100644
--- a/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc/template
+++ b/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc/template
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 _triplet=arm-none-eabi
 _pkgname=gcc
 pkgname=cross-${_triplet}-gcc
-version=9.3.0
+version=10.2.0
 revision=1
 wrksrc="gcc-${version}"
 build_wrksrc=build
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ maintainer="Ivan Sokolov <ivan-p-sokolov@ya.ru>"
 license="GFDL-1.2-or-later, GPL-3.0-or-later, LGPL-2.1-or-later"
 homepage="https://gcc.gnu.org"
 distfiles="${GNU_SITE}/gcc/gcc-${version}/gcc-${version}.tar.xz"
-checksum=71e197867611f6054aa1119b13a0c0abac12834765fe2d81f35ac57f84f742d1
+checksum=b8dd4368bb9c7f0b98188317ee0254dd8cc99d1e3a18d0ff146c855fe16c1d8c
 alternatives="arm-none-eabi:/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-cc:/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc"
 nocross=yes
 nopie=yes

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PR PATCH] [Updated] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
@ 2022-06-18 13:50 ` via
  2022-09-17  2:14 ` github-actions
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: via @ 2022-06-18 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 782 bytes --]

There is an updated pull request by via against master on the void-packages repository

https://github.com/via/void-packages via/bump-cross-arm
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580

Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages

#### Testing the changes
- I tested the changes in this PR: YES
I tested this with my own personal armv7 projects.  Notably, the version currently in packages has a bug with LTO that makes it discard ISR functions/symbols inappropriately, making LTO useless for some embedded use cases.  This appears fixed in gcc 10.

#### Local build testing
- I built this PR locally for my native architecture, amd64/glibc



A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580.patch is attached

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-via/bump-cross-arm-37580.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2417 bytes --]

From b3b3ff529c0b976553b35d583ddc5258d5f2b4d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthew Via <via@matthewvia.info>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 09:49:12 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils: update to 2.35

---
 srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils/template | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils/template b/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils/template
index fd106a2c40a6..df1b3836061d 100644
--- a/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils/template
+++ b/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils/template
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 _triplet=arm-none-eabi
 _pkgname=binutils
 pkgname=cross-${_triplet}-${_pkgname}
-version=2.32
-revision=2
+version=2.35
+revision=1
 wrksrc="${_pkgname}-${version}"
 build_style=gnu-configure
 configure_args="
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ maintainer="Ivan Sokolov <ivan-p-sokolov@ya.ru>"
 license="GPL-3.0-or-later"
 homepage="https://www.gnu.org/software/${_pkgname}/"
 distfiles="${GNU_SITE}/${_pkgname}/${_pkgname}-${version}.tar.xz"
-checksum=0ab6c55dd86a92ed561972ba15b9b70a8b9f75557f896446c82e8b36e473ee04
+checksum=1b11659fb49e20e18db460d44485f09442c8c56d5df165de9461eb09c8302f85
 nocross=yes
 
 post_install() {

From a95a6f60a995af6a309d7aeed74570f9184130a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthew Via <via@matthewvia.info>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 09:49:59 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc: update to 10.2.0

---
 srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc/template | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc/template b/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc/template
index 3896f61322b5..161a88f314c2 100644
--- a/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc/template
+++ b/srcpkgs/cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc/template
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 _triplet=arm-none-eabi
 _pkgname=gcc
 pkgname=cross-${_triplet}-gcc
-version=9.3.0
+version=10.2.0
 revision=1
 wrksrc="gcc-${version}"
 build_wrksrc=build
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ maintainer="Ivan Sokolov <ivan-p-sokolov@ya.ru>"
 license="GFDL-1.2-or-later, GPL-3.0-or-later, LGPL-2.1-or-later"
 homepage="https://gcc.gnu.org"
 distfiles="${GNU_SITE}/gcc/gcc-${version}/gcc-${version}.tar.xz"
-checksum=71e197867611f6054aa1119b13a0c0abac12834765fe2d81f35ac57f84f742d1
+checksum=b8dd4368bb9c7f0b98188317ee0254dd8cc99d1e3a18d0ff146c855fe16c1d8c
 alternatives="arm-none-eabi:/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-cc:/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc"
 nocross=yes
 nopie=yes

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
  2022-06-18 13:50 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " via
@ 2022-09-17  2:14 ` github-actions
  2022-10-01  2:16 ` [PR PATCH] [Closed]: " github-actions
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: github-actions @ 2022-09-17  2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 305 bytes --]

New comment by github-actions[bot] on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#issuecomment-1249978052

Comment:
Pull Requests become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that.  If this pull request is still relevant bump it or assign it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PR PATCH] [Closed]: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
  2022-06-18 13:50 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " via
  2022-09-17  2:14 ` github-actions
@ 2022-10-01  2:16 ` github-actions
  2022-10-01  9:06 ` JamiKettunen
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: github-actions @ 2022-10-01  2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 623 bytes --]

There's a closed pull request on the void-packages repository

Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580

Description:

#### Testing the changes
- I tested the changes in this PR: YES
I tested this with my own personal armv7 projects.  Notably, the version currently in packages has a bug with LTO that makes it discard ISR functions/symbols inappropriately, making LTO useless for some embedded use cases.  This appears fixed in gcc 10.

#### Local build testing
- I built this PR locally for my native architecture, amd64/glibc



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-01  2:16 ` [PR PATCH] [Closed]: " github-actions
@ 2022-10-01  9:06 ` JamiKettunen
  2022-10-01  9:06 ` JamiKettunen
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: JamiKettunen @ 2022-10-01  9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 295 bytes --]

New comment by JamiKettunen on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#issuecomment-1264300052

Comment:
Hm this is not being updated in #34902 unlike `cross-arm-linux-gnueabi` and `cross-arm-linux-musleabi`, I wonder if there is a particular reason why

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-01  9:06 ` JamiKettunen
@ 2022-10-01  9:06 ` JamiKettunen
  2022-10-05 18:04 ` JamiKettunen
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: JamiKettunen @ 2022-10-01  9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 271 bytes --]

New comment by JamiKettunen on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#issuecomment-1264300052

Comment:
Hm this is not being updated in #34902 unlike `cross-arm-linux-{gnu,musl}eabi`, I wonder if there is a particular reason why

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-01  9:06 ` JamiKettunen
@ 2022-10-05 18:04 ` JamiKettunen
  2022-10-05 18:10 ` via
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: JamiKettunen @ 2022-10-05 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 706 bytes --]

New comment by JamiKettunen on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#issuecomment-1268764275

Comment:
Copying @oreo639's response from `#xbps`:
> The cross-*-linux packages are dependant on the regular gcc/binutils/libc packages and pull patches from them, meaning that they have to be kept in sync (not to mention not updating them would cause inconsistent behavior in the builders when cross compiling vs native compiling).
>
> This isn't the case with cross-arm-none-eabi which is its own thing (generic newlib gcc compiler), meaning it makes more sense for it to be updated seperately. (preferably by someone who actually does embedded stuff and uses it)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-05 18:04 ` JamiKettunen
@ 2022-10-05 18:10 ` via
  2022-10-05 18:14 ` paper42
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: via @ 2022-10-05 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 462 bytes --]

New comment by via on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#issuecomment-1268771308

Comment:
Hi, I definitely still have interest in this, and use this set of packages for embedded use, I just haven't had time to fix the issues that cropped up.  Additionally I think I'd need to bump libstdc++ too, and at this point I might as well match the versions that gcc/binutils uses now.  I'll take another stab at this soon.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-05 18:10 ` via
@ 2022-10-05 18:14 ` paper42
  2022-10-05 18:30 ` JamiKettunen
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: paper42 @ 2022-10-05 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 242 bytes --]

New comment by paper42 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#issuecomment-1268774899

Comment:
We are actively working on updating gcc here: https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/34902

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-05 18:14 ` paper42
@ 2022-10-05 18:30 ` JamiKettunen
  2022-10-05 18:31 ` JamiKettunen
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: JamiKettunen @ 2022-10-05 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 333 bytes --]

New comment by JamiKettunen on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#issuecomment-1268796029

Comment:
> We are actively working on updating gcc here: #34902

@paper42 read my message a bit above, it excludes `arm-none-eabi` stuff entirely as this compiler is not used to build packages.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-05 18:30 ` JamiKettunen
@ 2022-10-05 18:31 ` JamiKettunen
  2022-10-05 18:31 ` JamiKettunen
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: JamiKettunen @ 2022-10-05 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 341 bytes --]

New comment by JamiKettunen on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#issuecomment-1268796029

Comment:
> We are actively working on updating gcc here: #34902

~~@paper42 read my message a bit above, it excludes `arm-none-eabi` stuff entirely as this compiler is not used to build packages.~~ nvm

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-05 18:31 ` JamiKettunen
@ 2022-10-05 18:31 ` JamiKettunen
  2022-10-13  2:26 ` [PR REVIEW] " wryun
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: JamiKettunen @ 2022-10-05 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 341 bytes --]

New comment by JamiKettunen on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#issuecomment-1268796029

Comment:
> We are actively working on updating gcc here: #34902

~~@paper42 read my message a bit above, it excludes `arm-none-eabi` stuff entirely as this compiler is not used to build packages.~~ nvm

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PR REVIEW] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-05 18:31 ` JamiKettunen
@ 2022-10-13  2:26 ` wryun
  2023-01-11  2:30 ` github-actions
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: wryun @ 2022-10-13  2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 242 bytes --]

New review comment by wryun on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#discussion_r994049836

Comment:
Random drive-by query - why is this nocross=yes (cross-arm-none-eabi-gdb/newlib don't have this)?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-13  2:26 ` [PR REVIEW] " wryun
@ 2023-01-11  2:30 ` github-actions
  2023-01-26  1:59 ` [PR PATCH] [Closed]: " github-actions
  2023-10-26 15:36 ` riddicc
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: github-actions @ 2023-01-11  2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 305 bytes --]

New comment by github-actions[bot] on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#issuecomment-1378164668

Comment:
Pull Requests become stale 90 days after last activity and are closed 14 days after that.  If this pull request is still relevant bump it or assign it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PR PATCH] [Closed]: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-01-11  2:30 ` github-actions
@ 2023-01-26  1:59 ` github-actions
  2023-10-26 15:36 ` riddicc
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: github-actions @ 2023-01-26  1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 623 bytes --]

There's a closed pull request on the void-packages repository

Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580

Description:

#### Testing the changes
- I tested the changes in this PR: YES
I tested this with my own personal armv7 projects.  Notably, the version currently in packages has a bug with LTO that makes it discard ISR functions/symbols inappropriately, making LTO useless for some embedded use cases.  This appears fixed in gcc 10.

#### Local build testing
- I built this PR locally for my native architecture, amd64/glibc



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages
  2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-01-26  1:59 ` [PR PATCH] [Closed]: " github-actions
@ 2023-10-26 15:36 ` riddicc
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: riddicc @ 2023-10-26 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 165 bytes --]

New comment by riddicc on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/37580#issuecomment-1781370235

Comment:
> bump it

bump! 😋

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-26 15:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-16  1:38 [PR PATCH] Bump cross-arm-none-eabi gcc and binutils to match non-cross packages via
2022-06-18 13:50 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " via
2022-09-17  2:14 ` github-actions
2022-10-01  2:16 ` [PR PATCH] [Closed]: " github-actions
2022-10-01  9:06 ` JamiKettunen
2022-10-01  9:06 ` JamiKettunen
2022-10-05 18:04 ` JamiKettunen
2022-10-05 18:10 ` via
2022-10-05 18:14 ` paper42
2022-10-05 18:30 ` JamiKettunen
2022-10-05 18:31 ` JamiKettunen
2022-10-05 18:31 ` JamiKettunen
2022-10-13  2:26 ` [PR REVIEW] " wryun
2023-01-11  2:30 ` github-actions
2023-01-26  1:59 ` [PR PATCH] [Closed]: " github-actions
2023-10-26 15:36 ` riddicc

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).