From: dataCobra <dataCobra@users.noreply.github.com>
To: ml@inbox.vuxu.org
Subject: [PR PATCH] sudo: update to 1.9.6.
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:39:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gh-mailinglist-notifications-41a7ca26-5023-4802-975b-f1789d68868e-void-packages-53029@inbox.vuxu.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 620 bytes --]
There is a new pull request by dataCobra against master on the void-packages repository
https://github.com/dataCobra/void-packages sudo
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/53029
sudo: update to 1.9.6.
#### Testing the changes
- I tested the changes in this PR: **YES**
#### Local build testing
- I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (x86_64-glibc)
- I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
- x86_64-musl
- i686
- aarch64
- aarch64-musl
- armv7l
A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/53029.patch is attached
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: github-pr-sudo-53029.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 5609 bytes --]
From 902777d56a380a7fdcdf30ce828612e4d0fb54b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dataCobra <datacobra@thinkbot.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:38:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sudo: update to 1.9.6.
---
srcpkgs/sudo/patches/fix-crosscompile.patch | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++
srcpkgs/sudo/template | 6 +-
2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 srcpkgs/sudo/patches/fix-crosscompile.patch
diff --git a/srcpkgs/sudo/patches/fix-crosscompile.patch b/srcpkgs/sudo/patches/fix-crosscompile.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..74002e19e295a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/srcpkgs/sudo/patches/fix-crosscompile.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+From 3e12cacc0f91bc27f0c8d627843bd22c8b5bb6fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@sudo.ws>
+Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 17:10:19 -0600
+Subject: [PATCH] Better test for cross-compiling when checking for C99
+ snprintf
+
+We want to avoid calling AX_FUNC_SNPRINTF entirely if cross-compiling
+since it is not possible to undo the setting of PREFER_PORTABLE_SNPRINTF.
+The previous attempt to do this failed to take into account that
+PREFER_PORTABLE_SNPRINTF would still be defined. GitHub issue #969
+---
+ configure | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
+ configure.ac | 13 +++++++------
+ 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/configure b/configure
+index 18eb2bdf27..a80cad01db 100755
+--- a/configure
++++ b/configure
+@@ -24790,7 +24790,31 @@ esac
+ COMPAT_TEST_PROGS="${COMPAT_TEST_PROGS}${COMPAT_TEST_PROGS+ }mktemp_test"
+
+ fi
+-ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "snprintf" "ac_cv_func_snprintf"
++if test X"$ac_cv_build_prog_cc_c99" != X"no" -a X"$cross_compiling" = X"yes"
++then :
++
++ # If we have a C99 compiler and are cross-compiling, assume
++ # C99-compliant v?snprintf().
++ ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "snprintf" "ac_cv_func_snprintf"
++if test "x$ac_cv_func_snprintf" = xyes
++then :
++ printf "%s\n" "#define HAVE_SNPRINTF 1" >>confdefs.h
++
++fi
++ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "vsnprintf" "ac_cv_func_vsnprintf"
++if test "x$ac_cv_func_vsnprintf" = xyes
++then :
++ printf "%s\n" "#define HAVE_VSNPRINTF 1" >>confdefs.h
++
++fi
++
++ ac_cv_have_working_snprintf="$ac_cv_func_snprintf"
++ ac_cv_have_working_vsnprintf="$ac_cv_func_vsnprintf"
++
++else case e in #(
++ e)
++ # Check for C99-compliant v?snprintf().
++ ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "snprintf" "ac_cv_func_snprintf"
+ if test "x$ac_cv_func_snprintf" = xyes
+ then :
+ printf "%s\n" "#define HAVE_SNPRINTF 1" >>confdefs.h
+@@ -24919,19 +24943,8 @@ printf "%s\n" "$as_me: WARNING: Replacing missing/broken (v)snprintf() with sudo
+ printf "%s\n" "#define PREFER_PORTABLE_SNPRINTF 1" >>confdefs.h
+
+ fi
+-if test X"$ac_cv_build_prog_cc_c99" != X"no"
+-then :
+-
+- # If we have a C99 compiler and are cross-compiling, assume
+- # C99-compliant v?snprintf().
+- if test X"$ac_cv_have_working_snprintf$ac_cv_have_working_vsnprintf" = X"crosscross"
+-then :
+-
+- ac_cv_have_working_snprintf=yes
+- ac_cv_have_working_vsnprintf=yes
+-
+-fi
+-
++ ;;
++esac
+ fi
+ if test X"$ac_cv_have_working_snprintf$ac_cv_have_working_vsnprintf" = X"yesyes"
+ then :
+diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
+index 28b63ef0d8..e547f79417 100644
+--- a/configure.ac
++++ b/configure.ac
+@@ -3060,14 +3060,15 @@ AS_IF([test X"$sudo_mktemp" = X"yes"], [
+ SUDO_APPEND_COMPAT_EXP(sudo_mkdtemp sudo_mkdtempat sudo_mkostempsat sudo_mkstemp sudo_mkstemps)
+ COMPAT_TEST_PROGS="${COMPAT_TEST_PROGS}${COMPAT_TEST_PROGS+ }mktemp_test"
+ ])
+-AX_FUNC_SNPRINTF
+-AS_IF([test X"$ac_cv_prog_cc_c99" != X"no"], [
++AS_IF([test X"$ac_cv_prog_cc_c99" != X"no" -a X"$cross_compiling" = X"yes"], [
+ # If we have a C99 compiler and are cross-compiling, assume
+ # C99-compliant v?snprintf().
+- AS_IF([test X"$ac_cv_have_working_snprintf$ac_cv_have_working_vsnprintf" = X"crosscross"], [
+- ac_cv_have_working_snprintf=yes
+- ac_cv_have_working_vsnprintf=yes
+- ])
++ AC_CHECK_FUNCS(snprintf vsnprintf)
++ ac_cv_have_working_snprintf="$ac_cv_func_snprintf"
++ ac_cv_have_working_vsnprintf="$ac_cv_func_vsnprintf"
++], [
++ # Check for C99-compliant v?snprintf().
++ AX_FUNC_SNPRINTF
+ ])
+ AS_IF([test X"$ac_cv_have_working_snprintf$ac_cv_have_working_vsnprintf" = X"yesyes"], [
+ # System has a C99-compliant v?snprintf(), check for v?asprintf()
diff --git a/srcpkgs/sudo/template b/srcpkgs/sudo/template
index 571fc60a83f044..758c8270238940 100644
--- a/srcpkgs/sudo/template
+++ b/srcpkgs/sudo/template
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Template file for 'sudo'
pkgname=sudo
-version=1.9.15p4
+version=1.9.16
revision=1
build_style=gnu-configure
configure_args="--with-ignore-dot --with-insults=disabled --with-all-insults --with-env-editor
@@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ configure_args="--with-ignore-dot --with-insults=disabled --with-all-insults --w
--with-logfac=auth --disable-root-mailer --enable-pie --with-mdoc
--sbindir=/usr/bin --disable-log-server"
hostmakedepends="groff"
-makedepends="zlib-devel pam-devel"
+makedepends="zlib-devel pam-devel openssl-devel"
short_desc="Allow others to run commands as root"
maintainer="Enno Boland <gottox@voidlinux.org>"
license="ISC"
homepage="https://www.sudo.ws/"
changelog="https://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/raw-file/tip/NEWS"
distfiles="https://www.sudo.ws/dist/sudo-${version}.tar.gz"
-checksum=2e20ec9865eeeea1316c6f49ec6ac4678869b689d4d90b44243bf4887d6dd532
+checksum=c0d84d797f06b732fc573d0b798ae83128c2bc33052057f05b560ec6bcbfa03d
conf_files="/etc/pam.d/sudo /etc/sudoers"
lib32disabled=yes
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 14:39 dataCobra [this message]
2024-11-12 14:40 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " dataCobra
2024-11-19 7:04 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] sudo: update to 1.9.16 dataCobra
2024-11-19 12:46 ` [PR PATCH] [Merged]: " leahneukirchen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=gh-mailinglist-notifications-41a7ca26-5023-4802-975b-f1789d68868e-void-packages-53029@inbox.vuxu.org \
--to=datacobra@users.noreply.github.com \
--cc=ml@inbox.vuxu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).