From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Received: by 10.50.138.72 with SMTP id qo8mr25752691igb.6.1434388095104; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:08:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: voidlinux@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.109.71 with SMTP id k65ls3904571qgf.48.gmail; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:08:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.84.202 with SMTP id l68mr367445qgd.5.1434388094890; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:08:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Frankie Wild To: voidlinux@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <1cfda652-6fa2-4d44-ab36-3f17f3be26ef@googlegroups.com> Subject: glibc vs musl - what is the difference for daily usage ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_732_1980650352.1434388094272" ------=_Part_732_1980650352.1434388094272 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_733_646453917.1434388094273" ------=_Part_733_646453917.1434388094273 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There is quite a lot of steer around musl those days. I have tried musl compiled mate based image of Void on virtual machine, but since Void is so fast I couldn't notice any difference between glibc images I have tried in the past. I have read stuff about smaller size, faster performance, but in reality it looks negligible. Is there more to it in the long run ? And what are the cons ? ------=_Part_733_646453917.1434388094273 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
There is quite a lot of steer around musl those days. I have tried musl compiled mate based image of Void on virtual machine, but since Void is so fast I couldn't notice any difference between glibc images I have tried in the past. 

I have read stuff about smaller size, faster performance, but in reality it looks negligible. Is there more to it in the long run ? And what are the cons ?
------=_Part_733_646453917.1434388094273-- ------=_Part_732_1980650352.1434388094272--