From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Received: by 10.236.16.131 with SMTP id h3mr2293413yhh.34.1421955187305; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:33:07 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: voidlinux@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.18.105 with SMTP id 96ls775988qge.50.gmail; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:33:07 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.102.19 with SMTP id v19mr56684qge.2.1421955187146; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:33:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:33:06 -0800 (PST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_M=C3=BChlinghaus?= To: voidlinux@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <2e7696dc-6d63-4eea-b015-45bb77426f15@googlegroups.com> Subject: Default runit services MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_883_515150131.1421955186887" ------=_Part_883_515150131.1421955186887 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_884_1621670660.1421955186887" ------=_Part_884_1621670660.1421955186887 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is it neccessary for all default runit services (e.g. 6 TTYs) to be active? I usually never need more then 2 but when I remove TTY3-6 from /var/service the next update of the runit package puts them back in. I would propose that the links are only created via INSTALL file unless a corresponding /etc/sv/agetty-ttyX/down file is present. That is, if the TTY-directories in /etc/sv aren't completely overwritten at the next runit-void update, which I think they are... Anyway, would this be a valid feature? Would someone other than me use it? :) ------=_Part_884_1621670660.1421955186887 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Is it neccessary for all default runit services (e.g. 6 TTYs) to be active? I usually never need more then 2 but when I remove TTY3-6 from /var/service the next update of the runit package puts them back in. I would propose that the links are only created via INSTALL file unless a corresponding /etc/sv/agetty-ttyX/down file is present. That is, if the TTY-directories in /etc/sv aren't completely overwritten at the next runit-void update, which I think they are...

Anyway, would this be a valid feature? Would someone other than me use it? :)
------=_Part_884_1621670660.1421955186887-- ------=_Part_883_515150131.1421955186887--