From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: polkovnik chechen <polkovn...@gmail.com>
To: voidlinux <void...@googlegroups.com>
Message-Id: <3cdfeb93-7b13-496c-a3a6-0ee93d069096@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <136404f1-c0f7-4f82-802a-28af7df653e3@googlegroups.com>
References: <136404f1-c0f7-4f82-802a-28af7df653e3@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: local repo
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_539_1085965618.1445348821566"

------=_Part_539_1085965618.1445348821566
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_540_2106812436.1445348821567"

------=_Part_540_2106812436.1445348821567
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

juan:
No, there's no way of installing pkgs without repos.

xbps has been designed to require a repository to store packages, the 
reason is that this
is the way to check its sha256 hash (for local repos) among others.

so is it requires check sha256 that download already?

------=_Part_540_2106812436.1445348821567
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<div dir="ltr"><div><div>juan:<br>No, there&#39;s no way of installing pkgs without repos.<br><br></div>xbps has been designed to require a repository to store packages, the reason is that this<br></div>is the way to check its sha256 hash (for local repos) among others.<br><br>so is it requires check sha256 that download already?<br></div>
------=_Part_540_2106812436.1445348821567--

------=_Part_539_1085965618.1445348821566--