From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 05:41:43 -0800 (PST) From: Userx Xbw To: voidlinux Message-Id: <642af09b-2519-487d-8273-7d876a825d7a@googlegroups.com> Subject: whats the big (other) difference between your MUSL and the other iso MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_35_1927239813.1451914903141" ------=_Part_35_1927239813.1451914903141 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_36_1705887913.1451914903141" ------=_Part_36_1705887913.1451914903141 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit you have two seperate iso's void-live-x86_64-musl-20151110-xfce.iso I googled musl and found out what that is, so what is this other one all about? void-live-i686-20151110-xfce.iso does that make it NOT ISO C and POSIX compliant? Then what would I have to deal with? ------=_Part_36_1705887913.1451914903141 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

you have two seperate iso's

void-live-x86_64-musl-20151110-xfce.iso

I googled musl and found out what that is, so what is this other one all about?

void-live-i686-20151110-xfce.iso 

does that make it NOT ISO C and POSIX compliant?

Then what would I have to deal with?

------=_Part_36_1705887913.1451914903141-- ------=_Part_35_1927239813.1451914903141--