From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Received: by 10.112.158.138 with SMTP id wu10mr3103464lbb.11.1457522068426; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 03:14:28 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: voidlinux@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.173.10 with SMTP id w10ls315582wme.24.gmail; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 03:14:27 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.84.40 with SMTP id v8mr4228132wjy.2.1457522067797; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 03:14:27 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z75si1026576wmz.2.2016.03.09.03.14.27 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 03:14:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of chneuk...@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of chneuk...@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=chneuk...@gmail.com; dkim=pass head...@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l68so171095803wml.0 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 03:14:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=29SRa95iJt1yrSVpxARuMN7nv+GmyJx/VvlkQzMHKBU=; b=ZzKqgYQT3VYlVQvgQn+blUL6fSJmt0dJKDlZD1Jl9OxBzZy+069MsBoge8f/xTRXNy HaSkhU2cx1r7XEJRr2bR9LYRTvE5w2yRO4dUXsJI9dKWw0TvMpTg93lLoLXVZwDAbfQq EOBbV8sph+bhVLLRkEqOyljnfNFZOTluyMsGIfbhgRnHS9tlzGJZ2Z/c3Fmf8VTyWaix i5UPgNylfMaZckygPNkQbdTXQHTO7AobpCdCD+hgDOoBYG5BontU9d9n/uLdKhiLvy/r jhC64KMIIFqPu4qQJ00jqvgQI/tZqbTPepBYveHnhewfh/eEuLRjXj3o5+OTdw8H3lyP q/dQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIczustWZDzkGkyztK/GU8vbUzkBL3bEGRLzPhRqoTyZ0VTsT/fIThZAb9V9DQitQ== X-Received: by 10.194.121.34 with SMTP id lh2mr34151842wjb.145.1457522067620; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 03:14:27 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from juno.home.vuxu.org ([2001:4ca0:0:f231:a288:b4ff:fea1:ce50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id js8sm7400230wjc.37.2016.03.09.03.14.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 03:14:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (juno.home.vuxu.org [local]) by juno.home.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 2e017c3f; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 11:14:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Christian Neukirchen To: marcin kowalski Cc: voidlinux Subject: Re: Are there rootfs tarballs for x86/x86_64 somewhere? References: <880280e5-8a18-4682-ae5c-dca33a4f1a3e@googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 12:14:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <880280e5-8a18-4682-ae5c-dca33a4f1a3e@googlegroups.com> (marcin kowalski's message of "Wed, 9 Mar 2016 02:03:09 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: <87y49r52en.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain marcin kowalski writes: > I am very comfortable with installing my systems off tarballs , and setting > up bootloader by hand (mostly because installing along another distro that > has such things already in place). Void seems to offer tarballs for > embedded targets but not for x86 family. > > Are those available somewhere else? I would very much prefer that to > typical installation. We have the scripts for it, but I think they are not automatically built. -- Christian Neukirchen http://chneukirchen.org