From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Received: by 10.43.91.68 with SMTP id bl4mr18754529icc.17.1422904464284; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:14:24 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: voidlinux@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.88.5 with SMTP id bc5ls1415786igb.0.gmail; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:14:24 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.62.203 with SMTP id z11mr19293145ich.9.1422904464163; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:14:24 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jn10si1043471igb.3.2015.02.02.11.14.24 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:14:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of xtr...@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of xtr...@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=xtr...@gmail.com; dkim=pass head...@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-ig0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hl2so19321858igb.0 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:14:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=DiB0/jOKcyuOjYOm+azVQA5fxWZfDdHmwcLqwn4Dx2A=; b=07AUex7vpI+tHqhET1zEj/orpYJUa/AQiWhTwHzW/YUEGihfOoEqnD1blh+YH80jCX 0pw65YovKqsJgq2NMMd0AJgJS1M+YKlfyBwNnceUoz9dV9/xey4Hy4EDfFMaVyPtM9YX GjVFAQp7U6dAEZwe0GL9sRjxhQGT5j9bfi1wVO5l6mkQJhal0yXu3m6Y5NbWZBwcsYlU ZeOM6OfP9dCufSKQVmVQ8ey7zSC5pUxbK3GyvNfxdtc9AGT3we3ifBQGAjWz0zC7/f45 FU90dcHz4UsoJPxE830hl3sMHmraanWHV2jwpY+p41kSfk1vZ3+wnPcQLW1VkQ9yT2a1 mLRw== X-Received: by 10.107.130.40 with SMTP id e40mr13434222iod.49.1422904464058; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:14:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.207.2 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 11:14:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3dc50f24-8562-4acd-b23c-632ad013bf8c@googlegroups.com> <0c0e2209-88d4-4871-bfab-97cad711ff53@googlegroups.com> From: Juan Romero Pardines Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 20:14:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Few packaging questions To: voidlinux@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ecd4a21302b050e1fc33e --001a113ecd4a21302b050e1fc33e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 No, there's no way of installing pkgs without repos. xbps has been designed to require a repository to store packages, the reason is that this is the way to check its sha256 hash (for local repos) among others. --001a113ecd4a21302b050e1fc33e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No, = there's no way of installing pkgs without repos.

xbps has = been designed to require a repository to store packages, the reason is that= this
is the way to check its sha256 hash (for local repos) among = others.

--001a113ecd4a21302b050e1fc33e--