Thanks for the info Christian.

On Wednesday, June 17, 2015 at 12:58:50 PM UTC+3, Christian Neukirchen 
wrote:
>
> Stefan Mühlinghaus <mast...@googlemail.com <javascript:>> writes: 
>
> > I would be interested in that as well. Is there any *tangible* benefit 
> in 
> > using the musl libc except having the warm fuzzies from using the leaner 
> > technology? :) 
> > I hesitate to switch to musl for fear of running into incompatibilities, 
> > but that could just be my superstitious self. 
>
> Just a few additions: 
>
> - MIT license, so you could build a GPL-free userland with it. 
> - Good support for static linking. 
> - Huge focus on correctness (which means in practice that sloppily 
>   written software can break...). 
> - Good UTF-8 support. 
> - Support for new and experimental architectures. 
>
> Also see http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html 
>
> -- 
> Christian Neukirchen  <chne...@gmail.com <javascript:>>  
> http://chneukirchen.org 
>