Thanks for the info Christian.

On Wednesday, June 17, 2015 at 12:58:50 PM UTC+3, Christian Neukirchen wrote:

Stefan Mühlinghaus <mast...@googlemail.com> writes:

> I would be interested in that as well. Is there any *tangible* benefit in
> using the musl libc except having the warm fuzzies from using the leaner
> technology? :)
> I hesitate to switch to musl for fear of running into incompatibilities,
> but that could just be my superstitious self.

Just a few additions:

- MIT license, so you could build a GPL-free userland with it.
- Good support for static linking.
- Huge focus on correctness (which means in practice that sloppily
  written software can break...).
- Good UTF-8 support.
- Support for new and experimental architectures.

Also see http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html

--
Christian Neukirchen  <chne...@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org