From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_M=C3=BChlinghaus?= <master...@googlemail.com>
To: voidlinux@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <c70d1273-79c1-41ae-9956-1f79b15e911c@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1cfda652-6fa2-4d44-ab36-3f17f3be26ef@googlegroups.com>
References: <1cfda652-6fa2-4d44-ab36-3f17f3be26ef@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: glibc vs musl - what is the difference for daily usage ?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_11_428385383.1434476346235"

------=_Part_11_428385383.1434476346235
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_12_1507947337.1434476346235"

------=_Part_12_1507947337.1434476346235
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I would be interested in that as well. Is there any *tangible* benefit in 
using the musl libc except having the warm fuzzies from using the leaner 
technology? :)
I hesitate to switch to musl for fear of running into incompatibilities, 
but that could just be my superstitious self.

------=_Part_12_1507947337.1434476346235
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<div dir="ltr">I would be interested in that as well. Is there any <u>tangible</u> benefit in using the musl libc except having the warm fuzzies from using the leaner technology? :)<div>I hesitate to switch to musl for fear of running into incompatibilities, but that could just be my superstitious self.</div></div>
------=_Part_12_1507947337.1434476346235--

------=_Part_11_428385383.1434476346235--