From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Received: by 10.236.38.194 with SMTP id a42mr28919480yhb.4.1432544530306; Mon, 25 May 2015 02:02:10 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: voidlinux@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.47.53 with SMTP id l50ls2943848qga.8.gmail; Mon, 25 May 2015 02:02:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.96.137 with SMTP id k9mr254305qge.10.1432544530083; Mon, 25 May 2015 02:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 02:02:09 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_M=C3=BChlinghaus?= To: voidlinux@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <28286178-9cd5-4bab-9bbf-04f44cff9902@googlegroups.com> References: <28286178-9cd5-4bab-9bbf-04f44cff9902@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: inetutils package conflicts? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_138_226188729.1432544529661" ------=_Part_138_226188729.1432544529661 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_139_507913113.1432544529661" ------=_Part_139_507913113.1432544529661 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I understand that and I already resolved the conflicts that way. But what is the point of having a package like inetutils-hostname when that tool is already provided by coreutils? It is not really viable to remove the coreutils package. Or is it? Maybe the conflicting tools should exclusively be provided by the inetuitls-packages? ------=_Part_139_507913113.1432544529661 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I understand that and I already resolved the conflicts that way. But what is the point of having a package like inetutils-hostname when that tool is already provided by coreutils? It is not really viable to remove the coreutils package. Or is it? Maybe the conflicting tools should exclusively be provided by the inetuitls-packages?
------=_Part_139_507913113.1432544529661-- ------=_Part_138_226188729.1432544529661--