From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:10:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Juan RP To: voidlinux Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <450c2513-8016-4bc7-a1f7-f24899aa22ea@googlegroups.com> References: <450c2513-8016-4bc7-a1f7-f24899aa22ea@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: repo data for musl wrong in void-package? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_0_65301003.1438585824145" ------=_Part_0_65301003.1438585824145 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1_614588144.1438585824153" ------=_Part_1_614588144.1438585824153 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The issue is that `noarch' packages built on musl don't match the ones built with glibc. You should use a different `hostdir` for `musl`, i.e: $ ./xbps-src -m masterdir-musl -H hostdir-musl binary-bootstrap x86_64-musl $ ./xbps-src -m masterdir-musl -H hostdir-musl ... (to build natively for x86_64/musl) ------=_Part_1_614588144.1438585824153 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The issue is that `noarch' packages built on musl don't match the ones built with glibc.

You should use a different `hostdir` for `musl`, i.e:

$ ./xbps-src -m masterdir-musl -H hostdir-musl binary-bootstrap x86_64-musl
$ ./xbps-src -m masterdir-musl -H hostdir-musl ...

(to build natively for x86_64/musl)


------=_Part_1_614588144.1438585824153-- ------=_Part_0_65301003.1438585824145--