From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Received: by 10.236.207.68 with SMTP id m44mr12843327yho.25.1425834888238; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:14:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: voidlinux@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.23.5 with SMTP id 5ls1169135qgo.94.gmail; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:14:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.94.170 with SMTP id g39mr364987qge.34.1425834888109; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:14:47 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_M=C3=BChlinghaus?= To: voidlinux@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <234a9f9c-0fc2-49ea-b876-75bd2531d775@googlegroups.com> References: <234a9f9c-0fc2-49ea-b876-75bd2531d775@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Problem building package MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_228_1759287352.1425834887687" ------=_Part_228_1759287352.1425834887687 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_229_1787673168.1425834887687" ------=_Part_229_1787673168.1425834887687 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Alright, nevermind. I posted too quickly. Apparently my mistake was to call the version "git". I'm using a date notation as version now and the package is created without a problem. I've also added the provided libraries to common/shlibs, completely preventing the library dependency warnings. Is that OK? Or is that file managed differently? ------=_Part_229_1787673168.1425834887687 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Alright, nevermind. I posted too quickly. Apparently my mistake was to call the version "git". I'm using a date notation as version now and the package is created without a problem.

I've also added the provided libraries to common/shlibs, completely preventing the library dependency warnings. Is that OK? Or is that file managed differently?
------=_Part_229_1787673168.1425834887687-- ------=_Part_228_1759287352.1425834887687--