From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 07:30:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Brodbeck To: voidlinux Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <69d6fc5f-4781-45bf-8f11-92b7405d74db@googlegroups.com> References: <15f1fd43-9b23-4573-9c44-b978796d9cab@googlegroups.com> <69d6fc5f-4781-45bf-8f11-92b7405d74db@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Missing expansion arrows in gtk+3 tree view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_182_259498097.1493130601027" ------=_Part_182_259498097.1493130601027 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_183_1340915065.1493130601027" ------=_Part_183_1340915065.1493130601027 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Donald, did you find a solution for the problem? I'm struggling with the same behaviour (only difference is that I use Rust bindings for gtk3). Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2015 19:05:43 UTC+2 schrieb Donald Allen: >>> >>> I have written a personal finance manager (which I call Newcash and >>> which I will be releasing on github as soon as I finish the documentation). >>> It is gtk+3-based and makes use of gtk's treeview to display the tree of >>> accounts. This display normally has little arrows to the left of expandable >>> accounts (those accounts in the tree with children). It works correctly on >>> Arch Linux, Linux Mint, OpenBSD, FreeBSD and I may have forgotten something >>> on which I've tested it. The arrows are missing when I run the application >>> on a newly installed Void system. Clicking in the area of the missing >>> arrows does expand the account, so that functionality works, but the lack >>> of the display of those little icons is unacceptable. I suspect it's due to >>> the font chosen by default, but that's pure speculation on my part. And >>> anticipating a question, yes, I did completely rebuild my application >>> having installed Void's gtk+3 and gtk+3-devel packages. >>> >>> I really like some of the ideas behind void (particularly the non-use of >>> systemd), but it feels like it's not quite ready for prime time. I realize >>> that putting a Linux distribution together is a huge amount of work >>> involving a gazillion details and so I'm not surprised that Void feels as >>> if it's not quite there yet, given its relative youth. >>> >> ------=_Part_183_1340915065.1493130601027 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Donald, did you find a solution for the problem? I'm s= truggling with the same behaviour (only difference is that I use Rust bindi= ngs for gtk3).

Am Mittwo= ch, 16. September 2015 19:05:43 UTC+2 schrieb Donald Allen:
I have written a personal finance = manager (which I call Newcash and which I will be releasing on github as so= on as I finish the documentation). It is gtk+3-based and makes use of gtk&#= 39;s treeview to display the tree of accounts. This display normally has li= ttle arrows to the left of expandable accounts (those accounts in the tree = with children). It works correctly on Arch Linux, Linux Mint, OpenBSD, Free= BSD and I may have forgotten something on which I've tested it. The arr= ows are missing when I run the application on a newly installed Void system= . Clicking in the area of the missing arrows does expand the account, so th= at functionality works, but the lack of the display of those little icons i= s unacceptable. I suspect it's due to the font chosen by default, but t= hat's pure speculation on my part. And anticipating a question, yes, I = did completely rebuild my application having installed Void's gtk+3 and= gtk+3-devel packages.

I really like some of the ideas behind void (= particularly the non-use of systemd), but it feels like it's not quite = ready for prime time. I realize that putting a Linux distribution together = is a huge amount of work involving a gazillion details and so I'm not s= urprised that Void feels as if it's not quite there yet, given its rela= tive youth.
------=_Part_183_1340915065.1493130601027-- ------=_Part_182_259498097.1493130601027--