From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD51DC43441 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5E82075B for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:53:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6A5E82075B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lonnie.abelbeck.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 917b007f; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 99c2995a for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ibughas.pair.com (ibughas.pair.com [209.68.5.177]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 0baaf997 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ibughas.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ibughas.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F31C1E3029; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:53:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from macpro.priv.abelbeck.com (wsip-174-76-218-225.om.om.cox.net [174.76.218.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ibughas.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFD401E3011; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:53:54 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions for a WG port to use with restrictive public wifi networks From: Lonnie Abelbeck In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:53:53 -0600 Message-Id: <020DC45A-7CA9-49E5-9A14-6300306F5476@lonnie.abelbeck.com> References: To: John X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) Cc: WireGuard mailing list X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" > On Nov 19, 2018, at 2:33 PM, John wrote: > > Should I stick with the "standard" udp service ports for my > trial-and-error based approach? Wikipedia has an article that lists > many of these (List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers). Any suggestions are > welcomed. Possibly: UDP/500 (IPSec IKE) or UDP/4500 (IPSec NAT-T) Lonnie _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard